Filament comparison
PLA Silk vs PLA Stone
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Silk PLAPLA | Stone-filled PLAPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $19.49/kg median; $9.75–$24.99/kg across 15 dated product listings | $22.99/kg median; $15.99–$49.16/kg across 6 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PLA with a gloss-forming additive package; suppliers publish the composition as polylactic acid only[1] | PLA filled with stone or mineral powder — Formfutura StoneFil declares 40–50 wt% stone powder[2][3] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.27 (ISO 1183)[1] | 1.22 (Bambu Lab PLA Marble) and 1.50–1.70 (Formfutura StoneFil), ISO 1183[3][2] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | Mainstream 1 kg spools cluster near 20[4][5][6] | 1 kg spools cluster near 21[7][8] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 10–25 across brands; CHCKX 10 in a 16-roll bundle, SUNLU 13, LANDU 18, YXPOLYER 20, Polymaker 22, Devil Design 25[9][10][11][12][13] | 16–49 across brands; SUNLU 16, ELEGOO 19, Polymaker 21, Bambu Lab 25, Prusament 38, Filament PM MarbleJet 49 on 0.5 kg spools[14][8][7][15][16][17] |
| Market availability1–5 | Stocked by most mainstream brands[4][9][18] | Stocked by most mainstream brands[7][8][14] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 mm; 1 and 1.1 kg spools; dual- and tri-colour coextruded variants[19][20] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.5 and 1 kg spools plus refills[8][2] |
| Typical applications | Decorative prints where surface gloss matters more than strength[1] | Architectural models, sculpture and props with a matte mineral surface[3] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.03 (Bambu Lab)[21] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 210–240 — 20 °C above the plain PLA window[1] | 190–230 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Bed temperature°C | 35–45[1] | 35–45 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[1][22] | Open frame is fine[3] |
| Part cooling fan | Fan on[1] | Fan on[3] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Cool Plate SuperTack, smooth PEI or textured PEI[1] | Not documented |
| Warping tendency1–5 | None[1] | Not documented |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Sticks to anything[23] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning; hotter nozzle and slower cap of 250 mm/s[1] | Easy — minor profile tuning; 0.2 mm nozzles are not usable[24] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Nozzles below 0.4 mm are not compatible (Bambu Lab)[24] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[22] | Brass acceptable; hardened steel for volume work — Bambu Lab's compatibility table says no hardened nozzle is needed while the note under the same table groups PLA Marble with particle-filled materials that should always use one[24] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[25][22] | Moderately abrasive — stone fill[24][2] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Very low[22] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle[24] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Moderate — good heatbreak cooling needed; PLA softens below 60 °C[26] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[23] | Not documented |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate — 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH[1] | Moderate — 0.44 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH[3] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.40 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[1] | 0.44 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Drying temperature & time | 55 °C for 8 h in a forced-air dryer, or 65–75 °C for 12 h on an X1 heatbed[1][27] | Not documented |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing, rough surface and weak layers[28] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity — the loss shows as poor layer adhesion and brittle layers rather than a published strength figure[28] | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures for this grade; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[28] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant below 20 % RH; shelf life at ambient is long[29][23] | Not documented |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 33 (printed XY, ISO 527); eSun Silk broke 22 % below the 16-brand PLA mean on identical 4×4 mm bars[1][30] | 33 ± 4 printed XY, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2130 (printed XY, ISO 527)[1] | 2330 ± 240 printed XY, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Elongation at break% | 2.8 (printed XY, ISO 527) — a quarter of PLA Basic at 12.2[1][29] | 6.7 ± 0.5 printed XY, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 75 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1] | 75 ± 5 printed XY, ISO 178 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 2460 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1] | 2920 ± 180 printed XY, ISO 178 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 10.3 (printed XY, ISO 179, notched); unnotched 18.5[1] | 9.5 ± 2.6 printed XY, ISO 179, notched (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Other impact data | Not documented | Charpy unnotched 24.0 printed XY (Bambu Lab, ISO 179)[3] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 25 (printed Z, ISO 527), and flexural Z collapses to 30 against 75 in XY; eSun Silk broke at 12.3 kg where twelve of the 16 plain PLAs managed 44.6–61.5 kg[1][30][31] | 30 ± 4 printed Z, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning[1] | Brittle — snaps with little warning[3] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Poor — no silk-specific creep data published; plain PLA sagged from 12 to 18.7–20.3 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[32][33] | Poor — no stone-filled creep test; plain printed PLA sagged from 12 to 16.2–21.8 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[32][34][35] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength (R = 0.2)[36][26] | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength and the mineral filler leaves a brittle compound[36][3] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rigid[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 76 by tensile, 40 by flexural (printed, Bambu Lab)[1] | 91 by tensile, 73 by flexural (printed, Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 60 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa)[1] | 56 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa)[3] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 56 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[1] | 53 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[3] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 57 (DSC)[1] | 56 (DSC)[3] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | 158 peak melt (DSC); Vicat 66 °C[1] | 156 peak melt (DSC); Formfutura gives a 120–170 melting range for StoneFil[3][2] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 50 — a loaded bar begins to move at this temperature (My Tech Fun, eSun eSilk PLA)[31] | Not documented |
| Annealing response | 50–55 °C for 6–12 h[1] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published by the major brands[29][37] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors[26][38] | Degrades within weeks outdoors[26] |
| Chemical resistance | Good against weak acids, oils and grease; poor against strong acids and alkalis; dissolved by chloroform, THF and hot benzene[37][26] | Not documented |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — insoluble in water[29] | Not documented |
| Food contact | Base resin is food-contact grade, but printed layer grooves harbour bacteria; Prusa advises against food use[26] | Not documented |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Industrially compostable only — needs sustained 55 °C; not home compostable[39][26] | Not documented |
| Recyclability | Mechanically recyclable; not accepted in household plastic collection[39] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[40] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[40] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | None needed in a normal room[40] | None needed in a normal room[40] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Not documented | Formfutura's SDS sets an occupational limit of 1 mg/m³ for the stone powder and lists it as both a fibre and a particulate — do not dry-sand without extraction[2] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Wet sanding — dry sanding heats the surface by friction and smears it[38][26] | Sands to a stone-like matte surface[2] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate for most joints; some grades partially dissolve and bond with acetone[26][41] | Not documented |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing — only chloroform, hot benzene or THF, which are laboratory-only[26] | Not documented |
| Support material pairing | Support for PLA (Bambu Lab)[1] | Support for PLA (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | 55° overhangs and 30 mm bridges; gloss hides fine detail and is destroyed by sanding[1] | Matte mineral surface hides layer lines; 55° overhangs and 30 mm bridges as for plain PLA[3] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform: 10 % w/v in 2–4 h at 23 °C, every grade and morphology; THF and DMF only at 65 °C. Laboratory reagents.[42] | Chloroform dissolves the PLA matrix (10 % w/v, 2–4 h at 23 °C) and leaves the filler as loose sludge; laboratory reagent.[42] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise it but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; submersion in acetone crazes and destroys parts.[42][43] | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise the matrix but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; acetone submersion crazes parts.[42][43] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Chloroform vapour smooths and welds PLA at the cost of tensile strength; acetone does not smooth it at all.[44][43] | Chloroform vapour attacks only the resin fraction, so the filler is left standing proud; no workshop-safe agent exists.[44][43] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V1.0 — PLA Silk+ Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- StoneFil safety data sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · msds
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PLA Marble Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Panchroma Silk PLA collection Polymaker Shop · 2026-08 · vendor
- Spectrum PLA Silk — product listing 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DJake ecoPLA Silk Black 1.75mm 1000g 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- PLA Marble — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- Sunlu Silk PLA+ 1.75mm 1kg Sunlu Official Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Bambu Lab PLA Silk 1.75mm 1kg 3D Universe · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX 16 Pack Silk Dual Color PLA Filament Bundle CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- YXPOLYER Silk PLA Black&Gold product page YXPOLYER · 2026-08 · vendor
- LANDU Silk Tri-Color PLA Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg LANDU (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU High Speed PLA Marble 3D Printer Filament 1 kg SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filament PM PLA MarbleJet technical data sheet Filament PM (Plasty Mladec) · 2026-08 · tds
- Overture Silk PLA 1.75mm Overture3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- eSUN PLA-Silk Magic 1.75mm eSUN Official Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- JAYO Silk PLA+ 1.75mm 1.1kg JAYO Official Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- PLA Basic — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA Usage Guide Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PLA — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Filament Drying Recommendations Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- 16 PLA brand comparison test — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2022-10 · test
- Testing eSun PLA filaments: PLA-ST vs PLA+ vs Silk PLA My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PolyTerra PLA vs PLA+ — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Polymaker PLA Pro vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Carbon Fiber PLA vs META-PLA vs PLA+ vs PLA by Sunlu — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PLA Technical Data Sheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2018-09 · tds
- Filamentive PLA (recycled) — product page Filamentive · 2026-08 · vendor
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment 1kg — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper