Filament comparison
rPLA vs PMMA
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Recycled PLA (rPLA)PLA | PMMA (acrylic)ENGINEERING |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $20.79/kg median; $16.05–$40.64/kg across 8 dated product listings | $49.99/kg median; $49.99–$49.99/kg across 1 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PLA regranulated from post-industrial PLA manufacturing waste; post-consumer feedstock is rare[1][2][3] | Poly(methyl methacrylate) — acrylic, sold for 3D printing as a transparent glass substitute[4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.24 (ISO 1183)[1] | Not documented |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools run 20–22[5][6][7] | 1 kg spools cluster near 50[8] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 16–41 across brands; Fiberlogy refill 16, Filamentive 750 g 41[9][10] | 50 at Push Plastic's 1 kg listing; 3 kg spools run the same per kilogram[8] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[2][3][7] | Special order, 1–2 makers worldwide[8] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.85 and 1 kg spools plus spool-less refills[11][9][2] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 1 and 3 kg spools[8] |
| Typical applications | General-purpose printing where the feedstock's recycled content matters more than an exact colour match[2][3] | Transparent covers and light guides where PC's yellowing or cost rules it out[4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.03 guaranteed by Prusa Research today; the 2021 datasheet specified ±0.05, against ±0.02 for virgin Prusament PLA[2][1][12] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 210 ± 10 (Prusament); 200 ± 15 (Filamentive)[1][3] | Not documented |
| Bed temperature°C | 40–60 (Prusament); up to 60 (Filamentive)[1][3] | Not documented |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[1][13] | Not documented |
| Part cooling fan | 100 %[1] | Not documented |
| Warping tendency1–5 | None — brim not generally needed[1] | Not documented |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Sticks to anything[14] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Beginner — prints on any machine out of the box[1][13] | Not documented |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[13] | Not documented |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[15][13] | Not documented |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Very low[13] | Not documented |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Moderate — good heatbreak cooling needed; PLA softens below 60 °C[16] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[14] | Not documented |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate — 0.3 % after both 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method), against 0.19 % in 7 days for virgin Prusament PLA[1][12] | Not documented |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.3 after 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method)[1] | Not documented |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing, rough surface and weak layers[17] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity — the loss shows as poor layer adhesion and brittle layers rather than a published strength figure[17] | Not documented |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant below 20 % RH; shelf life at ambient is long[18][14] | Not documented |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 49 printed horizontal and 55 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1, yield); virgin Prusament PLA gives 51 and 59 by the same method[1][12] | Not documented |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2100 printed horizontal, 2300 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2300 and 2400[1][12] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 3.1 at yield printed horizontal (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2.9[1][12] | Not documented |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 82 printed horizontal, 87 printed vertical XZ (ISO 178); virgin Prusament PLA 83 and 99[1][12] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 3100 printed horizontal (ISO 178) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[1][12] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 14.0 printed horizontal (ISO 179-1); virgin Prusament PLA 13[1][12] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 21 ± 2 (Prusa Polymers interlayer adhesion test); virgin Prusament PLA 17 ± 3 by the same test[1][12] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning[16][15] | Not documented |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 80 Shore D (Prusa Polymers in-house method); virgin Prusament PLA 81[1][12] | Not documented |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Poor — no recycled-PLA creep data published; virgin PLA sagged from 12 to 18.7–20.3 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[19][20] | Not documented |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength (R = 0.2)[21][16] | Not documented |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[15] | Not documented |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 55 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[1][12] | Not documented |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 53 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa); virgin Prusament PLA 55[1][12] | Not documented |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 55 (Filamentive states heat resistance up to 55 °C)[3] | Not documented |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | 96–99 for plain printed PLA (fibre Bragg grating, 25–50 °C); no grade-specific measurement published[22] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published by the major brands[18][23] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors[16][24] | Not documented |
| Chemical resistance | Good against weak acids, oils and grease; poor against strong acids and alkalis; dissolved by chloroform, THF and hot benzene[23][16] | Not documented |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — insoluble in water[18] | Not documented |
| Food contact | Filamentive certifies its rPLA to EN 71-3 and lists it food safe; printed layer grooves still harbour bacteria[3][16] | Not documented |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Industrially compostable only — needs sustained 55 °C; not home compostable[3] | Not documented |
| Recyclability | The feedstock itself; Filamentive uses 50 % post-industrial content and runs a PLA take-back scheme[3][10] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[25] | Not documented |
| Hazardous species emitted | Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment uses organic waste pigments such as red algae, which give a noticeable scent while printing[2] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | None needed in a normal room[25] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Wet sanding — dry sanding heats the surface by friction and smears it[24][16] | Not documented |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Superglue for most joints; acetone works on some grades depending on additives and colour[2] | Not documented |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing — only chloroform, hot benzene or THF, which are laboratory-only[16] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform: 10 % w/v in 2–4 h at 23 °C, every grade and morphology; THF and DMF only at 65 °C. Laboratory reagents.[26] | Acetone, MEK, ethyl and butyl acetate, THF, chloroform and carbon tetrachloride dissolve it; the last two are laboratory reagents.[27] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise it but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; submersion in acetone crazes and destroys parts.[26][28] | Alcohols, aliphatic hydrocarbons, oils and phthalate plasticisers craze it, and the threshold falls as stress rises.[27] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Chloroform vapour smooths and welds PLA at the cost of tensile strength; acetone does not smooth it at all.[29][28] | Dichloromethane acrylic cement (IPS Weld-On 3): 2–5 min soak, 17.2 MPa lap shear at one week. Controlled carcinogen.[30] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PLA Recycled Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2021-12 · tds
- Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment 1kg — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (recycled) — product page Filamentive · 2026-08 · vendor
- PMMA Filament 1.75mm 1kg — product page Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3D-Fuel ReFuel Recycled PLA 1kg 3D-Fuel · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta Black Recycled PLA 1kg Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Formfutura ReForm rPLA (White) 1kg Filament2Print · 2026-08 · vendor
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy rPLA Refill Anthracite 850 g 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (rPLA) 750 g CREATE Education · 2026-08 · vendor
- Kimya PLA-R 750 g Crea3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PLA Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PLA — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PolyTerra PLA vs PLA+ — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Characterization of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of 3D Printing Polymeric Materials Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors Materials 17(18):4668 · 2024-09 · paper
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PLA Technical Data Sheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2018-09 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Chemical resistance of PMMA products Mitsubishi Chemical (Acrypet) · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper
- Weld-On 3 Acrylic Plastic Cement — technical data sheet (shipped as dichloromethane) IPS Corporation · 2002-07 · tds