Filament comparison
HIPS vs PLA-GF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | HIPSABS | Glass-fibre PLA (PLA-GF)PLA |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $29.99/kg median; $27.99–$32.00/kg across 3 dated product listings | $44.99/kg median; $29.99–$59.99/kg across 2 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | High-impact polystyrene — polystyrene toughened with a butadiene rubber phase[1][2] | PLA filled with chopped glass fibre — 12 wt% (Polymaker HT-PLA-GF), 15–20 wt% (eSUN PLA-GF). Bambu Lab PLA Galaxy uses glass microspheres, not fibre, and is not equivalent[3][4][5] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.04 (ISO 1183)[1] | 1.31 (eSUN) to 1.337 (Polymaker), ISO 1183 / GB/T 1033[3][4] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 31[6][7] | 1 kg spools cluster near 30[8][9] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 28–32 across brands; YXPOLYER 28, Push Plastic 30, 3DXTech 32[7][6][10] | 30–60 across brands; Polymaker 30, Proto-pasta 60[8][9] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[6][7] | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[8][9][4] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 1 and 3 kg spools[7][6] | 1.75 mm; 0.5 and 1 kg spools[9][11] |
| Typical applications | Break-away and d-limonene-soluble support for ABS and ASA, and a light model material in its own right[2] | Stiff brackets and fixtures; the Polymaker grade is aimed at parts annealed for heat resistance[3] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 230–245 (Simplify3D)[12] | 210–230 (Polymaker HT-PLA-GF)[3] |
| Bed temperature°C | 100–115 (Simplify3D)[12] | 25–60 (Polymaker HT-PLA-GF)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Enclosure recommended[13] | Open frame is fine[3] |
| Part cooling fan | Part cooling fan not required[12] | Fan on — eSUN specifies 100 %[4] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Glue stick, glass plate, Kapton tape or PET sheets[12] | Not documented |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | Not documented | 28 at Polymaker's stated 350 mm/s on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer; eSUN prints its specimens at 60 mm/s[3][4][14] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Moderate — needs adhesion aid or draught shield[13] | Not documented |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs a specific surface plus adhesive[12] | Not documented |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Slight — HIPS oozes less than ABS[12][15] | Not documented |
| Shrinkage% | Not documented | 0.05 in X-Y and Z, 0.10 diagonal (Polymaker HT-PLA-GF)[3] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile[13] | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; hardened nozzle mandatory[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[13] | Hardened steel required[3] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[13] | Highly abrasive — standard GF composite[3] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — no special hot-end required, no drybox and no hardened nozzle, and 3DXTech states drying is not needed[12][16][2] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; Prusa lists higher risk of nozzle clogging for glass-filled composites[17] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[12] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[12] | Hardened steel or ruby nozzle; Polymaker's own slicer preset sets a minimum nozzle hardness of 40 HRC[3] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Low (0.1–0.3 %) — Simplify3D lists water resistance as a headline property[12] | Moderate — the PLA matrix takes up 0.40–0.51 % saturated; no glass-filled grade publishes its own figure[18][19] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | 60 °C for 6 h (Polymaker HT-PLA-GF)[3] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[20] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates ABS moderate-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures; absorbed water flashes to steam in the hotend and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[20] | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures for this grade; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[20] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; less critical than for the polyamides[20] | Not documented |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 40 at break (printed XY, ISO 527)[1] | 50.1 as printed and 50.2 annealed, printed XY, ISO 527 (Polymaker); eSUN quotes 59.3 by GB/T 1040[3][4] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 1350 (printed XY, ISO 527) — the lowest modulus of the styrenics here[1] | 3794 as printed, 4207 annealed, printed XY, ISO 527 (Polymaker)[3] |
| Elongation at break% | 18 at break (printed XY, ISO 527)[1] | 2.77 as printed, 2.3 annealed, printed XY, ISO 527 (Polymaker); eSUN quotes 7.99[3][4] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 70 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1] | 86.4 printed XY, ISO 178 (Polymaker)[3] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 1600 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1] | 3685 printed XY, ISO 178 (Polymaker); eSUN quotes 4415 flexural modulus by GB/T 9341[3][4] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | Not documented | 5.31 ± 0.46 as printed and 4.92 ± 0.50 annealed (printed XY, ISO 179, notched); Z 4.28 ± 0.18[3] |
| Other impact data | Not documented | Izod 10.16 kJ/m² (eSUN, GB/T 1843)[4] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | Not documented | 23.7 as printed, 22.5 annealed, printed Z, ISO 527 (Polymaker)[3] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[1] | Very brittle — elongation at break 2.77 % in XY and 0.85 % in Z[3] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Moderate — no printed-HIPS creep test found; Tg of 100 °C keeps room-temperature service far below softening[1][12] | Poor — no GF-grade creep test; plain printed PLA sagged from 12 to 16.2–21.8 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[21][22][23] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate[1] | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength and elongation at break falls to 2.77 % in XY and 0.85 % in Z[24][3] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rigid[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | Not documented | 47 as printed (23.7 Z against 50.1 XY), printed[3] |
| Wear resistance & friction | Not documented | eSUN describes high wear resistance and positions the grade for wear parts[4] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 75.5 as printed, 114.7 after annealing (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — the point of the material[3] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | Not documented | 59.7 as printed, 84 after annealing (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[3] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 100 (DSC)[1] | 59.8 (DSC)[3] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point[1] | 174.9 peak melt (DSC); Vicat 148.9 as printed, 148.3 annealed[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | Bounded by a glass transition of 100 °C; no loaded-bar service figure is published for HIPS[1] | Not documented |
| Annealing response | Not documented | Annealing lifts HDT at 0.45 MPa from 75.5 to 114.7 °C and modulus from 3794 to 4207 MPa[3] |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published[1] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Months outdoors before embrittlement — polystyrene yellows and chalks under UV[25] | Degrades within weeks outdoors[26] |
| Chemical resistance | Dissolves completely in d-limonene — the basis of its use as a soluble support[2] | Not documented |
| Food contact | Not food safe[25] | Not documented |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[25] | Not documented |
| Recyclability | Not accepted in household plastic collection[25] | Not documented |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10¹³ ohm/sq — insulating (ASTM D257)[1] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | High — hazardous VOC such as styrene; enclosure and filtration needed[27] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[27] |
| VOC emission rateµg/min | 12–113 styrene, the range measured across ABS and the one HIPS filament tested[27] | Not documented |
| Ultrafine-particle emission rateparticles/min | ≈4 × 10⁹ median for the HIPS filament tested, an order of magnitude below ABS but forty times PLA[27] | Not documented |
| Hazardous species emitted | Styrene was the only dominant VOC identified for the HIPS filament tested[27] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Enclosure with carbon and HEPA filtration[27] | None needed in a normal room[27] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Not documented | Glass fibre is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[28] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands and paints readily, like ABS[25] | Not documented |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Solvent-welds with d-limonene, and with acetone via its polystyrene backbone[12][2] | Not documented |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | d-limonene attacks the surface; acetone smoothing is far less effective than on ABS[2][12] | Not documented |
| Support material pairing | Used as the support material itself — dissolves in d-limonene, or breaks away from ABS and ASA[2] | Not documented |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Not documented | Near-zero shrinkage — 0.05 % in X-Y and Z (Polymaker)[3] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | d-limonene, 12–24 h submerged with occasional agitation; acetone also dissolves it, and xylene does so at 23 °C.[29][30][31] | Chloroform dissolves the PLA matrix (10 % w/v, 2–4 h at 23 °C) and leaves the filler as loose sludge; laboratory reagent.[32] |
| Softened or crazed by | Limonene also disrupts layer adhesion in some ABS and ASA grades, so an ABS model can flake apart in the same bath.[33] | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise the matrix but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; acetone submersion crazes parts.[32][34] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Limonene welds and lightly etches it; acetone welds through the polystyrene backbone but smooths less well than ABS.[29][33] | Chloroform vapour attacks only the resin fraction, so the filler is left standing proud; no workshop-safe agent exists.[35][34] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- 3DXMAX HIPS Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- 3DXMAX HIPS — product page 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker HT-PLA-GF Technical Data Sheet V1.1 Polymaker · 2026-08 · tds
- eSUN ePLA-GF Technical Data Sheet V1.0 (Nov 2023) eSUN (copy hosted on 3d.nice-cdn.com) · 2023-11 · tds
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V1.0 — PLA Galaxy Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker HT-PLA-GF — product page Polymaker Shop · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- YXPOLYER HIPS product page YXPOLYER · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- HIPS — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- ABS / ASA / PC Usage Guide Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- ABS — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Polymaker PLA Pro vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Carbon Fiber PLA vs META-PLA vs PLA+ vs PLA by Sunlu — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- ABS — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- StoneFil safety data sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · msds
- D-Limonene — FDM post-processing guide Filament2Print · 2026-08 · review
- Chemical resistance — resistance of Ensinger plastics to chemicals (DIN 50 014, 23/50) Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- HIPS — Knowledge Base Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper