Filament comparison
Conductive vs LW-PLA
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Conductive filamentSPECIALTY | Lightweight / foaming PLA (LW-PLA)PLA |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $170.36/kg median; $89.99–$796.00/kg across 4 dated product listings | $47.48/kg median; $37.49–$50.00/kg across 4 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | A carbon-filled compound conductive by volume rather than merely dissipative; Proto-pasta's is PLA-based, Recreus's and NinjaTek's are TPU, and add:north's Koltron G1 does not state its base polymer[1][2][3][4] | PLA with a blowing agent. Two distinct types: active-foaming grades that expand at the nozzle (Bambu Lab PLA Aero, colorFabb LW-PLA) and pre-foamed grades that do not (Polymaker PolyLite LW-PLA, PolyWood)[5][6][7][8] |
| Densityg/cm³ | Not documented | Filament 1.21 (Bambu Lab) and 1.24 (colorFabb); pre-foamed filament 0.8 (PolyWood, at 21.5 °C) and 0.9 (Polymaker LW-PLA); foamed prints reach 0.40[5][6][7][8] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 90–181 for the carbon-filled grades; add:north's Koltron G1 sits far above at 796 because it is sold only in 100 and 250 g coils[9][10][11] | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 45[12][6][13] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 90–796 across brands; Proto-pasta conductive PLA 90 at 1 kg, Recreus Conductive Filaflex 160 at 500 g, NinjaTek Eel 181 at 1 kg, add:north Koltron G1 796 at 250 g[9][2][10][11] | 37–50 across brands; Polymaker LW-PLA 37, Bambu Lab Aero 45, colorFabb 50, PolyWood 50[13][12][6] |
| Market availability1–5 | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[9][2] | Available from several mainstream brands[12][13][6] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 kg spools[9][2][10][11] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.6, 0.75, 0.8 and 1 kg spools[13][6] |
| Typical applications | Capacitive touch surfaces, low-current traces, EMI shielding and static-safe fixtures[1] | RC aircraft, drone airframes and large props where mass matters more than strength[5][6] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | Not documented | 210–260 (Bambu Lab, foaming); 195–260 (colorFabb, foaming); 190–210 (Polymaker, pre-foamed)[5][6][7] |
| Bed temperature°C | Not documented | 35–45 (Bambu Lab); 50–60 (colorFabb); 25–60 (Polymaker)[5][6][7] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[1] | Open frame is fine[7] |
| Part cooling fan | Not documented | Fan on[5][7] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | Not documented | 3.2–8 at the 40–100 mm/s colorFabb specifies and the 50–100 mm/s Polymaker specifies, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[7][6][14] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile[1] | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; flow has to be cut to match the expansion[6] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Bambu Lab PLA Aero is 0.4 mm nozzle only on the store and wiki, while its own TDS lists 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8[5][15] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass acceptable; hardened steel for volume work[1] | Brass fine indefinitely[7][8] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Moderately abrasive — conductive carbon filler[1] | Non-abrasive[7][8] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — Proto-pasta states the carbon-filled grade prints on standard PLA settings with no special nozzle required[1] | High — jams from moisture, heat creep or particles; Bambu Lab warns the foamed extrudate swells and easily clogs the nozzle, and rules out 0.2 mm nozzles[15] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Not documented | Moderate — 0.45 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); 0.40 % equilibrium (Polymaker)[5][7] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | Not documented | 0.45 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); 0.40 equilibrium (Polymaker)[5][7] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | 55 °C for 6–8 h[5][7] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[16] | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures for this grade; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[16] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | Not documented | 24 ± 2 (Bambu Lab) and 24.4 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527; colorFabb falls from 43.1 unfoamed to 10.8 at 45 % flow[5][7][6] |
| Young's modulusMPa | Not documented | 1350 ± 250 (Bambu Lab) and 1689 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527; colorFabb falls from 3334 unfoamed to 864 foamed[5][7][6] |
| Elongation at break% | Not documented | 2.6 ± 0.7 (Bambu Lab) and 8.8 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527[5][7] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | Not documented | 45 ± 4 (Bambu Lab) and 50.2 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 178[5][7] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | Not documented | 1690 ± 120 (Bambu Lab) and 1959 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 178[5][7] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | Not documented | 8.2 ± 0.7 printed XY, ISO 179, notched (Bambu Lab); colorFabb 3.67 foamed[5][6] |
| Other impact data | Not documented | Charpy unnotched 28.8 printed XY (Bambu Lab); colorFabb 5.46 foamed[5][6] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | Not documented | 18 ± 3 printed Z, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab); flexural Z collapses to 17 against 45 in XY[5] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning; carbon-black loading at conductive levels embrittles PLA[1] | Brittle — snaps with little warning; elongation at break 2.6 % in XY and 1.2 % in Z[5] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Not documented | Poor — no foamed-grade creep test; plain printed PLA sagged from 12 to 16.2–21.8 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, and the foam carries less solid[17][18][19] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Not documented | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength and elongation at break falls to 2.6 % in XY and 1.2 % in Z[20][5] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rigid[5] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | Not documented | 75 by tensile, 38 by flexural (printed, Bambu Lab)[5] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 53 (Bambu Lab) and 54 (Polymaker), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[5][7] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | Not documented | 48 (Bambu Lab) and 50 (Polymaker), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa[5][7] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | Not documented | 55 (Bambu Lab) and 59 (Polymaker), DSC[5][7] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Not documented | 150 peak melt (Polymaker, DSC); Vicat 60 °C[7] |
| Annealing response | Not documented | Bambu Lab advises against annealing thin, low-infill Aero prints[5] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Not documented | Degrades within weeks outdoors[21] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Conductive rather than dissipative — Proto-pasta sells the grade as electrically conductive composite PLA[1] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission; none of these materials was in the chamber study[22] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[22] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[22] | None needed in a normal room[22] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Conductive carbon filler is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[1] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Not documented | Foamed surfaces are rough and matte; dimensional accuracy depends on holding the foaming temperature steady[5][6] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform dissolves PLA-based grades, leaving the carbon black; TPU-based grades need DMF, NMP or THF. Laboratory reagents.[23][24] | Chloroform dissolves the PLA matrix; the foamed wall wicks solvent right through instead of only skinning over.[23] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone and ethyl acetate plasticise a PLA-based grade; a TPU-based grade swells in toluene, esters and alcohols.[23][24] | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise the matrix but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; acetone submersion crazes parts.[23][25] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | None — neither PLA nor TPU has a workshop-safe welding or smoothing solvent.[23][24] | Chloroform vapour reaches only the resin skin; no workshop-safe smoothing agent exists for PLA of any kind.[26][25] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Electrically Conductive Composite PLA — product page and technical data Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · tds
- Recreus product catalogue Recreus · 2026-08 · vendor
- Eel 3D Printing Filament Technical Specifications NinjaTek · 2026-08 · tds
- Koltron G1 Technical Data Sheet add:north · 2026-08 · tds
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V4.0 — PLA Aero Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- LW-PLA technical data sheet colorFabb · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyLite LW-PLA Technical Data Sheet (V7.0) Polymaker · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyWood Technical Data Sheet Version 4.0 (Nov 2018) Polymaker (copy hosted by 3Dee) · 2018-11 · tds
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Eel product page — durometer, print guidelines and price NinjaTek · 2026-08 · vendor
- add:north Koltron G1 product page add:north · 2026-08 · vendor
- PLA Aero — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA Usage Guide Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Polymaker PLA Pro vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Carbon Fiber PLA vs META-PLA vs PLA+ vs PLA by Sunlu — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Elastollan — Chemical properties: swelling and chemical resistance BASF · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper