Filament comparison
rPLA vs PP
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Recycled PLA (rPLA)PLA | Polypropylene (PP)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $20.79/kg median; $16.05–$40.64/kg across 8 dated product listings | $46.56/kg median; $31.99–$53.00/kg across 4 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PLA regranulated from post-industrial PLA manufacturing waste; post-consumer feedstock is rare[1][2][3] | Polypropylene — a semi-crystalline polyolefin with no polar groups, so it neither absorbs water nor bonds to most bed surfaces[4][5] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.24 (ISO 1183)[1] | 0.91 (Prusa PP composite, ISO 1183) — the lightest common filament[6] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools run 20–22[7][8][9] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 27–53; the middle of the market is about 44[10][11][12][13] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 16–41 across brands; Fiberlogy refill 16, Filamentive 750 g 41[14][15] | 27–53 across brands; Reli3D 32 on Amazon, SUNLU 44 at 0.8 kg, Fiberlogy 49 at 750 g, IEMAI 3D 53, and the 3DJake PP listing spans 27–49[10][16][11][12][13] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[2][3][9] | Available from several mainstream brands[16][11][10] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.85 and 1 kg spools plus spool-less refills[17][14][2] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 kg spools are common[11] |
| Typical applications | General-purpose printing where the feedstock's recycled content matters more than an exact colour match[2][3] | Living hinges, chemical-resistant containers, automotive clips and packaging prototypes[4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.03 guaranteed by Prusa Research today; the 2021 datasheet specified ±0.05, against ±0.02 for virgin Prusament PLA[2][1][18] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 210 ± 10 (Prusament); 200 ± 15 (Filamentive)[1][3] | 210–230 (Braskem-type PE/PP window); Formfutura's Centaur PP melts at 205 ± 15 °C[4] |
| Bed temperature°C | 40–60 (Prusament); up to 60 (Filamentive)[1][3] | Not documented |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[1][19] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[20][5] |
| Part cooling fan | 100 %[1] | Part cooling fan required (Simplify3D)[20] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Not documented | Packing tape, a polypropylene sheet, or a PP-specific adhesive such as Magigoo PP — ordinary PLA and ABS adhesives do not hold it[20][5] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | None — brim not generally needed[1] | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; PP's crystallinity drives shrinkage and Prusa recommends a brim on its PP grades[6][21] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Sticks to anything[22] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required. PP bonds to almost nothing; a polypropylene-specific tape or adhesive is the normal answer[6][5] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Not documented | Slight — Polymaker advises 1–2 mm retraction at 20–30 mm/s[5] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Beginner — prints on any machine out of the box[1][19] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; bed adhesion is the whole problem[5][6] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[19] | Brass fine indefinitely for unfilled grades — Simplify3D states no special hotend is required[20] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[23][19] | Non-abrasive when unfilled[20] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Very low[19] | Low — Simplify3D lists no special hotend requirement for PP and clogging is not among its listed drawbacks[24][20] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Moderate — good heatbreak cooling needed; PLA softens below 60 °C[25] | Slightly sensitive[20] |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[22] | No special hot-end required (Simplify3D)[20] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate — 0.3 % after both 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method), against 0.19 % in 7 days for virgin Prusament PLA[1][18] | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[6] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.3 after 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method)[1] | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers, measured on its PP composite)[6] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | No drying step is published for PP; uptake is below the level that affects printing[6] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing, rough surface and weak layers[24] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle; Polymaker still advises a 70 °C dry for 4–6 h despite the low uptake[5] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity — the loss shows as poor layer adhesion and brittle layers rather than a published strength figure[24] | Not applicable in practice — with equilibrium uptake at 0.04 %, there is no moisture-driven strength loss to measure. Polymaker's sensitivity tiers put polyolefins below even PLA[6][24] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant below 20 % RH; shelf life at ambient is long[26][22] | No special storage needed[6] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 49 printed horizontal and 55 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1, yield); virgin Prusament PLA gives 51 and 59 by the same method[1][18] | 12 at yield (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[4] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2100 printed horizontal, 2300 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2300 and 2400[1][18] | 724 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D638; converted from 105,000 psi)[27] |
| Elongation at break% | 3.1 at yield printed horizontal (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2.9[1][18] | Above 600 at break (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[4] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 82 printed horizontal, 87 printed vertical XZ (ISO 178); virgin Prusament PLA 83 and 99[1][18] | 31.0 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D790; converted from 4500 psi)[27] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 3100 printed horizontal (ISO 178) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[1][18] | 402 flexural modulus (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D790) — an order of magnitude below any rigid filament[4] |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 14.0 printed horizontal (ISO 179-1); virgin Prusament PLA 13[1][18] | Izod notched 112 J/m on extruded PP stock, converted from 2.1 ft-lb/in (ASTM D256)[27] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 21 ± 2 (Prusa Polymers interlayer adhesion test); virgin Prusament PLA 17 ± 3 by the same test[1][18] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning[25][23] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[4] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 80 Shore D (Prusa Polymers in-house method); virgin Prusament PLA 81[1][18] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded PP stock (ASTM D785)[27] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Poor — no recycled-PLA creep data published; virgin PLA sagged from 12 to 18.7–20.3 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[28][29] | Below average[4] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength (R = 0.2)[30][25] | Excellent — living hinges viable, the classic polypropylene application[4] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[23] | Semi-flexible[4] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 55 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[1][18] | 74 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D648 at 66 psi; converted from 165 °F)[27] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 53 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa); virgin Prusament PLA 55[1][18] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Not documented | 205 ± 15 melting (Formfutura Centaur PP)[4] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 55 (Filamentive states heat resistance up to 55 °C)[3] | Bounded by a melting point of 205 ± 15 °C and by the 158 °C heat deflection of the carbon-filled grade; no loaded-bar service figure is published for unfilled PP[4][6] |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | 96–99 for plain printed PLA (fibre Bragg grating, 25–50 °C); no grade-specific measurement published[31] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published by the major brands[26][32] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for the grades surveyed[6] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors[25][33] | Months outdoors before embrittlement — unstabilised polypropylene chalks under UV[5] |
| Chemical resistance | Good against weak acids, oils and grease; poor against strong acids and alkalis; dissolved by chloroform, THF and hot benzene[32][25] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents — the usual reason to choose PP[5] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — insoluble in water[26] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[6] |
| Food contact | Filamentive certifies its rPLA to EN 71-3 and lists it food safe; printed layer grooves still harbour bacteria[3][25] | Polypropylene is a common food-packaging polymer, but no filament here carries a food-contact certification[5] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Industrially compostable only — needs sustained 55 °C; not home compostable[3] | Not biodegradable[5] |
| Recyclability | The feedstock itself; Filamentive uses 50 % post-industrial content and runs a PLA take-back scheme[3][15] | Mechanically recyclable as resin code 5, but printed waste is not accepted in household collection[5] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[34] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[34] |
| Hazardous species emitted | Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment uses organic waste pigments such as red algae, which give a noticeable scent while printing[2] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | None needed in a normal room[34] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[34] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Wet sanding — dry sanding heats the surface by friction and smears it[33][25] | Sands poorly — the waxy surface loads abrasive paper[20] |
| Painting & finishing | Not documented | Paint and adhesives do not key to untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is normally needed first[5] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Superglue for most joints; acetone works on some grades depending on additives and colour[2] | Nothing common bonds untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is needed before adhesives key[5] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing — only chloroform, hot benzene or THF, which are laboratory-only[25] | No practical vapour smoothing[20] |
| Support material pairing | Not documented | Prints its own supports; no soluble support is rated for PP[20] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Not documented | Shrinkage and warping dominate; the low modulus means parts flex rather than hold tolerance[6] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform: 10 % w/v in 2–4 h at 23 °C, every grade and morphology; THF and DMF only at 65 °C. Laboratory reagents.[35] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves it at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C — the xylene-solubles route.[36][37] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise it but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; submersion in acetone crazes and destroys parts.[35][38] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[36] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Chloroform vapour smooths and welds PLA at the cost of tensile strength; acetone does not smooth it at all.[39][38] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[36] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PLA Recycled Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2021-12 · tds
- Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment 1kg — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (recycled) — product page Filamentive · 2026-08 · vendor
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- 3D-Fuel ReFuel Recycled PLA 1kg 3D-Fuel · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta Black Recycled PLA 1kg Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Formfutura ReForm rPLA (White) 1kg Filament2Print · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU product catalogue SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy PP Natural — product page 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Low Warp PP Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI 3D PP 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy rPLA Refill Anthracite 850 g 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (rPLA) 750 g CREATE Education · 2026-08 · vendor
- PP filament listing 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Kimya PLA-R 750 g Crea3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PLA Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- PLA — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PLA — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PolyTerra PLA vs PLA+ — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Characterization of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of 3D Printing Polymeric Materials Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors Materials 17(18):4668 · 2024-09 · paper
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PLA Technical Data Sheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2018-09 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper