Filament comparison
PETG vs TPE SEBS
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PETGPETG | TPE (SEBS)FLEX |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $19.99/kg median; $8.99–$69.99/kg across 21 dated product listings | $98.25/kg median; $76.50–$120.00/kg across 2 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolymer — PET with a glycol comonomer that suppresses crystallisation[1][2] | Styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene thermoplastic elastomer — a styrenic rubber, not a polyurethane[3] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.24–1.30 (ISO 1183)[1][2][4][5] | 1.044 printed part density (BASF Ultrafuse TPS 90A, ISO 1183-1) — the lightest elastomer here[3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 20[6][7][8] | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 77[9] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 12–70 across brands; IEMAI 12, ELEGOO 14, CHCKX 14, Bambu Lab 18–20, Hatchbox 26, Prusament 38, Prusament PETG V0 70[6][7][10][8][11][12] | 77 for the Recreus 600 g spool; Proto-pasta only lists a 50 g coil, which prices at 120[9][13] |
| Market availability1–5 | Ubiquitous, every brand and retailer[6][7][14][8] | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[3][13][9] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.8 and 1 kg spools plus spool-less refills[7][8] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.05 and 0.6 kg spools[3][9] |
| Typical applications | Functional parts, enclosures and outdoor fittings that need more toughness and heat tolerance than PLA[1][2] | Soft-touch overmoulds and skin-contact parts where a non-polyurethane elastomer is wanted[3] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.02 (Prusament)[1] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 230–260 across brands; Prusament 250 ± 10, Polymaker 240–260[1][2][5] | 260–280 (BASF Ultrafuse TPS 90A) — far hotter than any TPU here[3] |
| Bed temperature°C | 60–90; Prusament 80 ± 10, Polymaker 60–70[1][5] | 70–90 (BASF Ultrafuse TPS 90A)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[5] | Open frame is fine[3] |
| Part cooling fan | Around 50 %; Polymaker specifies 20–60 %, less than PLA to protect layer bonding[1][5] | Not documented |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets. On smooth PEI a glue stick is used as a release agent, not an adhesive — PETG bonds to bare PEI hard enough to tear the sheet[1][5] | PEI sheet or painter's tape; Polymaker warns TPU can over-stick and advises a glue stick as a release agent[15][16] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 8–15 (PrusaSlicer guidance); My Tech Fun ran Bambu Lab PETG Basic at 13 mm³/s[17][18] | 0.8–2.4 at the 10–30 mm/s BASF specifies on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer — the slowest material in this group[3] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Slight — corner lift on large flat parts[1][5] | Not documented |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[1] | Not documented |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed[1][5] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning[5] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning[3] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Nozzle 0.4 mm or larger; BASF caps print speed at 10–30 mm/s[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[17] | Brass fine indefinitely[19] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[5] | Non-abrasive[19] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — no special hot-end required and clogging is not among the listed drawbacks; Prusa lists no drybox and no hardened nozzle[20][21] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; BASF caps print speed at 10–30 mm/s and Simplify3D warns that raised feed rates on flexibles most likely end in a jam[15][3] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[20] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[20] | No special hot-end required, but a direct-drive extruder is (Simplify3D)[15] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — Bambu Lab reports 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH; Prusa measures only 0.07 % in 24 h and 0.10 % in 7 days at the drier 22 % RH[1][22] | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — BASF states drying is not necessary, unique among the elastomers here[3] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.10 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers); 0.40 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[1][22] | Not documented |
| Drying temperature & time | 60–65 °C for 6–8 h[5][22] | None — BASF states Ultrafuse TPS 90A arrives in a printable condition and drying is not necessary[3] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[1] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[23] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic and shows a before-and-after-drying comparison; the loss appears as poor layer adhesion and weak, brittle layers rather than a published dry-versus-conditioned figure[23] | Not applicable — the SEBS chemistry has no amide or ester linkages to take up water, and BASF specifies no drying at all[3] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[23][24] | Sealed with desiccant; often kept in a dryer during the print[23] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 38–51 (printed XY, ISO 527); Prusament 47 ± 2 at yield; 62 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm bars[1][2][4][25] | Not documented |
| Young's modulusMPa | 1500–2311 (printed XY, ISO 527)[1][2][4][5] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 5.2–9.3 at break (printed XY, ISO 527); Prusament 5.1 at yield[2][4][5][1] | Not documented |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 58–80 (printed XY, ISO 178); Prusament 66 ± 2[1][2][4][5] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 1068–2277 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1][2][4][5] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 2.6 (PolyLite) to 11.6 (PolyMax) printed XY, ISO 179, notched; Prusament 6 ± 1[2][4][1] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched does not break on Prusa's 4 J pendulum (ISO 179-1); Izod 3.37 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars[1][25] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 18 ± 4 (Prusa interlayer adhesion test); 42.8 printed Z for PolyLite PETG; 33 on My Tech Fun bars[1][2][25] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Moderate[1][2] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 74 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method); measured on printed bars at 68.2 for Extrudr PETG, 72 for Fiberlogy PETG and 72.8 for Prusament PETG[1][25][26][27] | 89 Shore A and 29 Shore D (BASF Ultrafuse TPS 90A, ISO 7619-1)[3] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 18.2 mm (Fiberlogy) and 19.4 mm (Bambu Lab Basic) over 5 days at 1.25 kg[25][18] | Poor — no SEBS creep test; a printed 95A TPU bar crept from 74.5 to 82.7 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[28] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate — 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength, about three times printed PLA (R = 0.2, 7 Hz)[29] | Excellent — living hinges viable[16] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[1] | Rubbery / highly elastic[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 84 (PolyLite, printed Z against XY tensile)[2] | Not documented |
| Wear resistance & friction | Not documented | Abrasion 111 mm³ (ISO 4649) — the poorest abrasion resistance in this group, well behind TPU[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 68 (Prusament) to 78 (PolyLite), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[1][2][5] | Not documented |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 65 (Polymaker) to 75 (PolyLite), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa; Prusament 68[1][2][5] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 71–81 (DSC)[2][4][5] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 75–84 (ISO 306)[2][4][5] | 242–249 melting (BASF Ultrafuse TPS 90A, ISO 11357-3)[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 61–66 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature across six grades from four brands; Prusa publishes 68 for Prusament PETG[25][26][27][18][30] | Not documented |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | 65 at 30 °C (neat PETG, large-format printed bead, TMA)[31] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard PETG, though flame-retardant V0 grades exist[32][24] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Moderate — a season or two[1] | Good — years with some colour shift; Polymaker lists UV exposure among the conditions TPU withstands[16] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure — Polymaker names outdoor use as a result[24] | Withstands industrial solvents and UV exposure (Polymaker)[16] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — minor absorption[1] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[3] |
| Food contact | PET is the polymer of drinks bottles, but printed layer grooves harbour bacteria and no filament here carries a food-contact certification[24] | Not food safe without specific certification (Polymaker)[16] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[24] | Not biodegradable[16] |
| Recyclability | PET is widely recycled as bottle stock, but printed PETG waste is not accepted in household collection[24] | Not accepted in household plastic collection[16] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[33] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission; TPU was not among the nine filaments in the chamber study[33] |
| Ultrafine-particle emission rateparticles/min | ≈5 × 10⁹ median for the PET-based T-Glase filament in the same chamber study, against ≈1 × 10⁸ for PLA[33] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[33] | Open a window / occasional ventilation[33] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[20] | Difficult to sand or smooth; Polymaker limits post-processing to trimming or tumbling[16] |
| Painting & finishing | Paint adheres poorly without abrasion and a primer[1] | Not documented |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[20] | Cyanoacrylate bonds TPU; no common solvent welds it[16] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[1] | No practical vapour smoothing[16] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[20] | Polymaker warns TPU supports are often very difficult to remove[16] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Stringing and blobbing are the usual accuracy limits, not shrinkage[1][5] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it inside a week and dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the surface.[34][35] | Toluene dissolves SEBS at room temperature — Kraton quotes solution viscosity at 25 % mass in toluene, 25 °C.[36] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[34] | Soaking in hydrocarbon solvents and oils deteriorates it; short exposures are tolerated. Resists water, acids and bases.[36] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[35] | Toluene will weld it, though the joint stays soft; no workshop-safe agent, and vapour smoothing is not practical.[36] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PolyLite PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- Ultrafuse TPS 90A Technical Data Sheet (Version 1.1, SEBS) BASF Forward AM · 2020-12 · tds
- PolyMax PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- Polymaker PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- PETG Basic — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- Recreus product catalogue Recreus · 2026-08 · vendor
- Black PETG Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg — product data Hatchbox · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI PETG 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX PETG 3D Printer Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg, Black CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- Flexible (TPE/TPU) — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- TPU — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Extrudr Product Catalogue (DURAPRO PA12 data block) Extrudr · 2025-03 · tds
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PETG HF Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Extrudr PETG vs PCTG vs XPETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Prusament PETG-CF vs PETG V0 vs PETG — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- BambuLab TPU 95A HF vs Qidi TPU 95A HF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2024-02 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Prusament PETG — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Effects of Fiber Orientation on the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Fiber-Filled Polymer Systems in Large Format Polymer Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Materials 15(8):2764 · 2022-04 · paper
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- KRATON polymers Grade Range — chemical resistance and toluene solution data Kraton Corporation · 2025-07 · tds