Filament comparison
PETG vs PP
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PETGPETG | Polypropylene (PP)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $19.99/kg median; $8.99–$69.99/kg across 21 dated product listings | $46.56/kg median; $31.99–$53.00/kg across 4 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolymer — PET with a glycol comonomer that suppresses crystallisation[1][2] | Polypropylene — a semi-crystalline polyolefin with no polar groups, so it neither absorbs water nor bonds to most bed surfaces[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.24–1.30 (ISO 1183)[1][2][5][6] | 0.91 (Prusa PP composite, ISO 1183) — the lightest common filament[7] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 20[8][9][10] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 27–53; the middle of the market is about 44[11][12][13][14] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 12–70 across brands; IEMAI 12, ELEGOO 14, CHCKX 14, Bambu Lab 18–20, Hatchbox 26, Prusament 38, Prusament PETG V0 70[8][9][15][10][16][17] | 27–53 across brands; Reli3D 32 on Amazon, SUNLU 44 at 0.8 kg, Fiberlogy 49 at 750 g, IEMAI 3D 53, and the 3DJake PP listing spans 27–49[11][18][12][13][14] |
| Market availability1–5 | Ubiquitous, every brand and retailer[8][9][19][10] | Available from several mainstream brands[18][12][11] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.8 and 1 kg spools plus spool-less refills[9][10] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 kg spools are common[12] |
| Typical applications | Functional parts, enclosures and outdoor fittings that need more toughness and heat tolerance than PLA[1][2] | Living hinges, chemical-resistant containers, automotive clips and packaging prototypes[3] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.02 (Prusament)[1] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 230–260 across brands; Prusament 250 ± 10, Polymaker 240–260[1][2][6] | 210–230 (Braskem-type PE/PP window); Formfutura's Centaur PP melts at 205 ± 15 °C[3] |
| Bed temperature°C | 60–90; Prusament 80 ± 10, Polymaker 60–70[1][6] | Not documented |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[6] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[20][4] |
| Part cooling fan | Around 50 %; Polymaker specifies 20–60 %, less than PLA to protect layer bonding[1][6] | Part cooling fan required (Simplify3D)[20] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets. On smooth PEI a glue stick is used as a release agent, not an adhesive — PETG bonds to bare PEI hard enough to tear the sheet[1][6] | Packing tape, a polypropylene sheet, or a PP-specific adhesive such as Magigoo PP — ordinary PLA and ABS adhesives do not hold it[20][4] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 8–15 (PrusaSlicer guidance); My Tech Fun ran Bambu Lab PETG Basic at 13 mm³/s[21][22] | Not documented |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Slight — corner lift on large flat parts[1][6] | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; PP's crystallinity drives shrinkage and Prusa recommends a brim on its PP grades[7][23] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[1] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required. PP bonds to almost nothing; a polypropylene-specific tape or adhesive is the normal answer[7][4] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed[1][6] | Slight — Polymaker advises 1–2 mm retraction at 20–30 mm/s[4] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning[6] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; bed adhesion is the whole problem[4][7] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[21] | Brass fine indefinitely for unfilled grades — Simplify3D states no special hotend is required[20] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[6] | Non-abrasive when unfilled[20] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — no special hot-end required and clogging is not among the listed drawbacks; Prusa lists no drybox and no hardened nozzle[24][25] | Low — Simplify3D lists no special hotend requirement for PP and clogging is not among its listed drawbacks[26][20] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[24] | Slightly sensitive[20] |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[24] | No special hot-end required (Simplify3D)[20] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — Bambu Lab reports 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH; Prusa measures only 0.07 % in 24 h and 0.10 % in 7 days at the drier 22 % RH[1][27] | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[7] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.10 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers); 0.40 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[1][27] | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers, measured on its PP composite)[7] |
| Drying temperature & time | 60–65 °C for 6–8 h[6][27] | No drying step is published for PP; uptake is below the level that affects printing[7] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[1] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle; Polymaker still advises a 70 °C dry for 4–6 h despite the low uptake[4] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic and shows a before-and-after-drying comparison; the loss appears as poor layer adhesion and weak, brittle layers rather than a published dry-versus-conditioned figure[26] | Not applicable in practice — with equilibrium uptake at 0.04 %, there is no moisture-driven strength loss to measure. Polymaker's sensitivity tiers put polyolefins below even PLA[7][26] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[26][28] | No special storage needed[7] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 38–51 (printed XY, ISO 527); Prusament 47 ± 2 at yield; 62 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm bars[1][2][5][29] | 12 at yield (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[3] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 1500–2311 (printed XY, ISO 527)[1][2][5][6] | 724 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D638; converted from 105,000 psi)[30] |
| Elongation at break% | 5.2–9.3 at break (printed XY, ISO 527); Prusament 5.1 at yield[2][5][6][1] | Above 600 at break (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[3] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 58–80 (printed XY, ISO 178); Prusament 66 ± 2[1][2][5][6] | 31.0 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D790; converted from 4500 psi)[30] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 1068–2277 (printed XY, ISO 178)[1][2][5][6] | 402 flexural modulus (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D790) — an order of magnitude below any rigid filament[3] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 2.6 (PolyLite) to 11.6 (PolyMax) printed XY, ISO 179, notched; Prusament 6 ± 1[2][5][1] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched does not break on Prusa's 4 J pendulum (ISO 179-1); Izod 3.37 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars[1][29] | Izod notched 112 J/m on extruded PP stock, converted from 2.1 ft-lb/in (ASTM D256)[30] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 18 ± 4 (Prusa interlayer adhesion test); 42.8 printed Z for PolyLite PETG; 33 on My Tech Fun bars[1][2][29] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Moderate[1][2] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 74 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method); measured on printed bars at 68.2 for Extrudr PETG, 72 for Fiberlogy PETG and 72.8 for Prusament PETG[1][29][31][32] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded PP stock (ASTM D785)[30] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 18.2 mm (Fiberlogy) and 19.4 mm (Bambu Lab Basic) over 5 days at 1.25 kg[29][22] | Below average[3] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate — 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength, about three times printed PLA (R = 0.2, 7 Hz)[33] | Excellent — living hinges viable, the classic polypropylene application[3] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[1] | Semi-flexible[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 84 (PolyLite, printed Z against XY tensile)[2] | Not documented |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 68 (Prusament) to 78 (PolyLite), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[1][2][6] | 74 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D648 at 66 psi; converted from 165 °F)[30] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 65 (Polymaker) to 75 (PolyLite), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa; Prusament 68[1][2][6] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 71–81 (DSC)[2][5][6] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 75–84 (ISO 306)[2][5][6] | 205 ± 15 melting (Formfutura Centaur PP)[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 61–66 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature across six grades from four brands; Prusa publishes 68 for Prusament PETG[29][31][32][22][34] | Bounded by a melting point of 205 ± 15 °C and by the 158 °C heat deflection of the carbon-filled grade; no loaded-bar service figure is published for unfilled PP[3][7] |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | 65 at 30 °C (neat PETG, large-format printed bead, TMA)[35] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard PETG, though flame-retardant V0 grades exist[36][28] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for the grades surveyed[7] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Moderate — a season or two[1] | Months outdoors before embrittlement — unstabilised polypropylene chalks under UV[4] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure — Polymaker names outdoor use as a result[28] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents — the usual reason to choose PP[4] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — minor absorption[1] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[7] |
| Food contact | PET is the polymer of drinks bottles, but printed layer grooves harbour bacteria and no filament here carries a food-contact certification[28] | Polypropylene is a common food-packaging polymer, but no filament here carries a food-contact certification[4] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[28] | Not biodegradable[4] |
| Recyclability | PET is widely recycled as bottle stock, but printed PETG waste is not accepted in household collection[28] | Mechanically recyclable as resin code 5, but printed waste is not accepted in household collection[4] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[37] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[37] |
| Ultrafine-particle emission rateparticles/min | ≈5 × 10⁹ median for the PET-based T-Glase filament in the same chamber study, against ≈1 × 10⁸ for PLA[37] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[37] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[37] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[24] | Sands poorly — the waxy surface loads abrasive paper[20] |
| Painting & finishing | Paint adheres poorly without abrasion and a primer[1] | Paint and adhesives do not key to untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is normally needed first[4] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[24] | Nothing common bonds untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is needed before adhesives key[4] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[1] | No practical vapour smoothing[20] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[24] | Prints its own supports; no soluble support is rated for PP[20] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Stringing and blobbing are the usual accuracy limits, not shrinkage[1][6] | Shrinkage and warping dominate; the low modulus means parts flex rather than hold tolerance[7] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it inside a week and dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the surface.[38][39] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves it at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C — the xylene-solubles route.[40][41] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[38] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[40] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[39] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[40] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PolyLite PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PolyMax PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- Polymaker PETG Technical Data Sheet Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- PETG Basic — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU product catalogue SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy PP Natural — product page 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Low Warp PP Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI 3D PP 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Black PETG Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg — product data Hatchbox · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI PETG 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX PETG 3D Printer Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg, Black CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- PP filament listing 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PETG HF Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Extrudr PETG vs PCTG vs XPETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Prusament PETG-CF vs PETG V0 vs PETG — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Prusament PETG — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Effects of Fiber Orientation on the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Fiber-Filled Polymer Systems in Large Format Polymer Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Materials 15(8):2764 · 2022-04 · paper
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper