Filament comparison
PETG-ESD vs rPLA
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | ESD-safe PETGPETG | Recycled PLA (rPLA)PLA |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $102.99/kg median; $65.98–$140.00/kg across 2 dated product listings | $20.79/kg median; $16.05–$40.64/kg across 8 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PETG compounded with a conductive filler to bring surface resistivity into the static-dissipative range[1][2] | PLA regranulated from post-industrial PLA manufacturing waste; post-consumer feedstock is rare[3][4][5] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.24 (Fiberon) and 1.28 (3DXTech), ISO 1183[1][2] | 1.24 (ISO 1183)[3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 66–140; the middle of the market is about 103[6][7] | 1 kg spools run 20–22[8][9][10] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 66–140 across brands; Fiberon PETG-ESD 66, 3DXSTAT ESD-PETG 140[6][7] | 16–41 across brands; Fiberlogy refill 16, Filamentive 750 g 41[11][12] |
| Market availability1–5 | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[6][7] | Available from several mainstream brands[4][5][10] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 mm; 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 3 kg spools[6][7] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.85 and 1 kg spools plus spool-less refills[13][11][4] |
| Typical applications | Electronics fixtures, trays and jigs handled around static-sensitive components[1][2] | General-purpose printing where the feedstock's recycled content matters more than an exact colour match[4][5] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | Not documented | ±0.03 guaranteed by Prusa Research today; the 2021 datasheet specified ±0.05, against ±0.02 for virgin Prusament PLA[4][3][14] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 250–290 (Fiberon)[1] | 210 ± 10 (Prusament); 200 ± 15 (Filamentive)[3][5] |
| Bed temperature°C | 70–80 (Fiberon); 70 (3DXTech)[1][2] | 40–60 (Prusament); up to 60 (Filamentive)[3][5] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine — Fiberon specifies room-temperature chamber[1] | Open frame is fine[3][15] |
| Part cooling fan | Not documented | 100 %[3] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets; on smooth PEI a glue stick acts as a release agent[16][17] | Not documented |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | Fiberon rates the material to 500 mm/s, equivalent to 40 on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer — a machine-limited headline rather than a measured melt rate[1][18] | Not documented |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | None — brim not generally needed[3] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[16][17] | Sticks to anything[19] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker names stringing as PETG's common quirk[17] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; resistivity depends on getting the nozzle temperature right[1] | Beginner — prints on any machine out of the box[3][15] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required[1] | Brass fine indefinitely[15] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Moderately abrasive — conductive carbon filler[1] | Non-abrasive[20][15] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — 3DXTech lists no special nozzle concerns and no minimum layer height for its ESD-PETG, only a 65 °C pre-dry[21] | Very low[15] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[22] | Moderate — good heatbreak cooling needed; PLA softens below 60 °C[23] |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[22] | No special hot-end required[19] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — the PETG matrix reaches 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH and 3DXTech specifies a 65 °C, 4 h pre-dry[16][21] | Moderate — 0.3 % after both 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method), against 0.19 % in 7 days for virgin Prusament PLA[3][14] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.41 equilibrium water absorption (Fiberon PETG-ESD)[1] | 0.3 after 24 h and 7 days at 28 °C / 37 % RH (Prusa Polymers method)[3] |
| Drying temperature & time | 65 °C for 3 h (Fiberon)[1] | Not documented |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[24] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing, rough surface and weak layers[24] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic; no dry-versus-conditioned strength figures are published for this grade and the loss shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[24] | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity — the loss shows as poor layer adhesion and brittle layers rather than a published strength figure[24] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[24][17] | Sealed with desiccant below 20 % RH; shelf life at ambient is long[25][19] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 36.1 ± 0.9 printed XY, ISO 527 (Fiberon); 3DXTech quotes 50 at break[1][2] | 49 printed horizontal and 55 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1, yield); virgin Prusament PLA gives 51 and 59 by the same method[3][14] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 1983 ± 75 printed XY, ISO 527 (Fiberon)[1] | 2100 printed horizontal, 2300 printed vertical XZ (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2300 and 2400[3][14] |
| Elongation at break% | 7.3 ± 0.7 printed XY, ISO 527 (Fiberon); 3DXTech quotes 13 at break[1][2] | 3.1 at yield printed horizontal (ISO 527-1); virgin Prusament PLA 2.9[3][14] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 54.0 ± 2.5 printed XY, ISO 178 (Fiberon)[1] | 82 printed horizontal, 87 printed vertical XZ (ISO 178); virgin Prusament PLA 83 and 99[3][14] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 1651 ± 141 printed XY, ISO 178 (Fiberon)[1] | 3100 printed horizontal (ISO 178) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[3][14] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 5.7 ± 0.5 printed XY, ISO 179, notched (Fiberon)[1] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 29.3 ± 2.2 printed XY (Fiberon, ISO 179)[1] | Charpy unnotched 14.0 printed horizontal (ISO 179-1); virgin Prusament PLA 13[3][14] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 20.7 ± 0.6 printed Z, ISO 527 (Fiberon)[1] | 21 ± 2 (Prusa Polymers interlayer adhesion test); virgin Prusament PLA 17 ± 3 by the same test[3][14] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Moderate[1] | Brittle — snaps with little warning[23][20] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | Not documented | 80 Shore D (Prusa Polymers in-house method); virgin Prusament PLA 81[3][14] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — no ESD-grade creep test; unfilled PETG sagged from 12 to 17.1–20.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[26][27][28][29] | Poor — no recycled-PLA creep data published; virgin PLA sagged from 12 to 18.7–20.3 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[30][31] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate — no ESD-grade S-N curve; unfilled printed PETG ran 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength[32] | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength (R = 0.2)[32][23] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[1] | Rigid[20] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 57 (Fiberon, printed Z against XY tensile)[1] | Not documented |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 76 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa, Fiberon)[1] | 55 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — the same as virgin Prusament PLA[3][14] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 72 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa, Fiberon)[1] | 53 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa); virgin Prusament PLA 55[3][14] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 77 (Fiberon) and 80 (3DXTech), DSC[1][2] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 86 (Fiberon, ISO 306)[1] | Not documented |
| Continuous service temperature°C | Not documented | 55 (Filamentive states heat resistance up to 55 °C)[5] |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | Not documented | 96–99 for plain printed PLA (fibre Bragg grating, 25–50 °C); no grade-specific measurement published[33] |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard grades[34] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published by the major brands[25][35] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Not documented | Degrades within weeks outdoors[23][36] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure[17] | Good against weak acids, oils and grease; poor against strong acids and alkalis; dissolved by chloroform, THF and hot benzene[35][23] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Not documented | Good — insoluble in water[25] |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact as filament[17] | Filamentive certifies its rPLA to EN 71-3 and lists it food safe; printed layer grooves still harbour bacteria[5][23] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[17] | Industrially compostable only — needs sustained 55 °C; not home compostable[5] |
| Recyclability | Not accepted in household plastic collection[17] | The feedstock itself; Filamentive uses 50 % post-industrial content and runs a PLA take-back scheme[5][12] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistivity falls with nozzle temperature: 7.0×10⁶–1.6×10⁷ ohm at 250 °C, 3.2×10⁵–4.7×10⁵ at 270 °C and below 1×10⁴ at 290 °C (Fiberon); 3DXTech quotes 10⁷–10⁹ ohm/sq[1][2] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[37] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[37] |
| Hazardous species emitted | Not documented | Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment uses organic waste pigments such as red algae, which give a noticeable scent while printing[4] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[37] | None needed in a normal room[37] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Conductive carbon filler is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[1] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[22] | Wet sanding — dry sanding heats the surface by friction and smears it[36][23] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[22] | Superglue for most joints; acetone works on some grades depending on additives and colour[4] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[22] | No practical vapour smoothing — only chloroform, hot benzene or THF, which are laboratory-only[23] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[22] | Not documented |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Nozzle temperature has to be held steady — it moves surface resistivity by three orders of magnitude[1] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it inside a week and dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the surface.[38][39] | Chloroform: 10 % w/v in 2–4 h at 23 °C, every grade and morphology; THF and DMF only at 65 °C. Laboratory reagents.[40] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[38] | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise it but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; submersion in acetone crazes and destroys parts.[40][39] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[39] | Chloroform vapour smooths and welds PLA at the cost of tensile strength; acetone does not smooth it at all.[41][39] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Fiberon PETG-ESD Technical Data Sheet V1.1 Polymaker · 2026-08 · tds
- 3DXSTAT ESD-PETG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PLA Recycled Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2021-12 · tds
- Prusament rPLA Corn Pigment 1kg — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (recycled) — product page Filamentive · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3D-Fuel ReFuel Recycled PLA 1kg 3D-Fuel · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta Black Recycled PLA 1kg Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Formfutura ReForm rPLA (White) 1kg Filament2Print · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy rPLA Refill Anthracite 850 g 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filamentive PLA (rPLA) 750 g CREATE Education · 2026-08 · vendor
- Kimya PLA-R 750 g Crea3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PLA Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PLA — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- 3DXSTAT ESD-PETG — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Extrudr PETG vs PCTG vs XPETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Prusament PETG-CF vs PETG V0 vs PETG — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PolyTerra PLA vs PLA+ — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Characterization of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of 3D Printing Polymeric Materials Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors Materials 17(18):4668 · 2024-09 · paper
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PLA Technical Data Sheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2018-09 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper