Filament comparison
PETG-CF vs TPU 85A
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Carbon-fibre PETG (PETG-CF)PETG | TPU 85AFLEX |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $29.99/kg median; $16.00–$74.22/kg across 11 dated product listings | $89.89/kg median; $31.99–$106.05/kg across 6 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PETG reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[1][2] | Soft thermoplastic polyurethane at 82–85 Shore A[3][4][5] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.25 (Bambu Lab) to 1.34 (3DXTech), ISO 1183; Prusament 1.27[1][6][2] | 1.11 (BASF Ultrafuse 85A) to 1.19 (NinjaFlex 85A), ISO 1183 / ASTM D792[5][3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 16–74; the middle of the market is about 29[1][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 32–106; the middle of the market is about 90[14][15][3] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 16–74 across brands; ELEGOO 16 in a 5 kg pack, Reli3D 17, SUNLU 20, IEMAI 22, Siraya Tech 25, Bambu Lab 32, Sakata 3D 53, 3DXTech 67, Prusament 70, Filament PM 74 on 0.5 kg spools[16][1][14][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] | 32–106 across brands; Siraya Tech Flex TPU 85A 32 at 1 kg, add:north TPU Pro Matte 85A 72, Recreus Filaflex 82A 90 at 500 g, Proto-pasta Clear Flexible TPU 90, 3DXTech 3DXFLEX 85A 96, NinjaTek NinjaFlex 106[17][14][15][18][3] |
| Market availability1–5 | Stocked by most mainstream brands[1][14][7][16] | Available from several mainstream brands[14][17] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 and 1 kg spools[14][1] | 1.75, 2.85 and 3 mm; 0.5, 1 and 2 kg spools[14][17][3] |
| Typical applications | Stiff functional parts and fixtures where PETG's toughness is traded for rigidity and a matte finish[1][2] | Soft-touch grips, seals, wearables and anything that must compress and rebound[3][4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.02 (Prusament)[2] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 240–270 (Bambu Lab); 265 ± 10 (Prusament)[1][2] | 200–220 (BASF Ultrafuse 85A, 210 typical)[5] |
| Bed temperature°C | 65–75 (Bambu Lab); 90 ± 10 (Prusament)[1][2] | 40 (BASF Ultrafuse 85A)[5] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame fine; draught shield helps — Bambu Lab specifies a 35–50 °C chamber[1] | Open frame is fine[5] |
| Recommended chamber temperature°C | 35–50 (Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Part cooling fan | 0–60 % (Bambu Lab); 50 % (Prusament)[1][2] | Not documented |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI or engineering plate with glue (Bambu Lab)[1] | PEI sheet or painter's tape; Polymaker warns TPU can over-stick and advises a glue stick as a release agent[19][20] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 11.5 on My Tech Fun's Bambu Lab PETG-CF profile[21] | 1.2–3.2 at the 15–40 mm/s BASF specifies on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[5] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | None[5] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive[1] | Sticks to anything — Recreus states its 82A grade has excellent bed adhesion without a heated bed or additives[4] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Slight — the fibre reduces stringing against unfilled PETG[1][22] | High — drying plus tuning needed[23][20] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; hardened nozzle mandatory[1] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; at this hardness the filament will not push through a Bowden tube[3][4] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Direct drive only. NinjaTek calls its 85A grade ideal for direct-drive extruders and Recreus specifies direct-drive printers for 82A; BASF caps print speed at 15–40 mm/s with a nozzle of 0.4 mm or larger[3][4][5] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required[1] | Brass fine indefinitely[24] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[1] | Non-abrasive[24] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; 3DXTech specifies a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers or higher, and Prusa lists composites as a higher clogging risk[25][26] | High — jams from moisture, heat creep or particles[23][20] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[22] | Very high — softens in the cold zone readily; soft filament buckles between the drive gear and the melt zone[20][3] |
| Hotend requirement | Hardened steel nozzle; no high-temperature hot-end needed[1][22] | No special hot-end required, but a direct-drive extruder is (Simplify3D)[19] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Low — 0.30 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[1] | Moderate — NinjaTek measures 0.22 % in 24 h (ASTM D570) and BASF specifies a 70 °C dry for at least 5 h[3][5] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.30 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); Prusa measures 0.10 after 7 days at 22 % RH[1][2] | 0.22 after 24 h water immersion (NinjaFlex 85A, ASTM D570) — an immersion figure, not an equilibrium moisture content at 50 % RH[3] |
| Drying temperature & time | 65 °C for 8 h (Bambu Lab)[1] | 70 °C for at least 5 h in a hot-air dryer or vacuum oven (BASF)[5] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[23] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[23] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | No dry-versus-conditioned figures published; Bambu Lab states PETG-CF must be properly dried before printing and stored dry after use[1][23] | Polymaker groups TPU with the highly hygroscopic materials; wet TPU prints with poor layer adhesion and weak, brittle layers[23] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Bambu Lab says store dry after use[1][23] | Sealed with desiccant; often kept in a dryer during the print[23] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 35 ± 5 (Bambu Lab) and 47 ± 2 at yield (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527; 56 at break for 3DXTech[1][2][6] | 26 ultimate (NinjaFlex 85A, ASTM D638)[3] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2460 ± 230 (Bambu Lab) and 1700 (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527[1][2] | 12 (NinjaFlex 85A, ASTM D638) — two orders of magnitude below any rigid filament; NinjaTek's 95A Cheetah reaches 26 by the same method[3][27] |
| Elongation at break% | 4.3 at yield (Prusament, printed XY, ISO 527); 3 at break for 3DXTech[2][6] | 650 at break (Filaflex 82A) and 660 (NinjaFlex 85A); BASF measures 600 in XY and 320 in ZX[4][3][5] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 68 ± 3 printed horizontal, ISO 178 (Prusament)[2] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 2300 printed horizontal, 3100 printed vertical, ISO 178 (Prusament)[2] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 29 ± 6 printed horizontal and 43 ± 8 printed vertical (Prusament, ISO 179-1); Izod 4.91 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun bars[2][21] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 29 ± 4 printed Z (Bambu Lab, ISO 527); 18 ± 3 by Prusa's interlayer adhesion test; 10.7 on My Tech Fun bars[1][2][21] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning[6] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 77 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method)[2] | 29 Shore D / 85 Shore A (BASF Ultrafuse 85A, ISO 7619-1); 85 Shore A (NinjaFlex, ASTM D2240); 82 A nominal for Filaflex[3][5][4] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 16.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, less than plain PETG's 19.4[21] | Poor — no 85A creep test; a printed 95A TPU bar crept from 74.5 to 82.7 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, and softer grades creep more[28] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate — no CF-grade S-N curve; unfilled printed PETG ran 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength[29] | Excellent — living hinges viable[20] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rubbery / highly elastic[3][4] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 83 (Bambu Lab, printed Z against XY tensile)[1] | 53 — BASF measures 320 % elongation at break in ZX against 600 % in XY[5] |
| Wear resistance & friction | Not documented | Abrasion 0.08 g mass loss over 10 000 cycles (NinjaFlex, ASTM D4060); 82 mm³ (BASF, ISO 4649)[3][5] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 74 (Bambu Lab) and 96 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[1][2] | Not documented |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa[1][2] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (3DXTech), DSC[1][6] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | 225 melting (Bambu Lab, DSC) — the carbon fibre lets the PET fraction crystallise[1] | 216 melting (NinjaFlex 85A, DSC)[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 77 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 61 for Bambu Lab PETG Basic[21] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published[1] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Moderate — a season or two; the carbon fibre does not add UV stabilisation[30] | Good — years with some colour shift; Polymaker lists UV exposure among the conditions TPU withstands[20] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure, as for unfilled PETG[30] | Withstands industrial solvents and UV exposure (Polymaker)[20] |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact[30] | Not food safe without specific certification (Polymaker)[20] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[30] | Not biodegradable[20] |
| Recyclability | Fibre-filled PETG is not accepted in household plastic collection[30] | Not accepted in household plastic collection[20] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10⁹ ohm/sq — carbon fibre at this loading is not static-dissipative (3DXTech)[6] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[31] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission; TPU was not among the nine filaments in the chamber study[31] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[31] | Open a window / occasional ventilation[31] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[6] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands to a matte finish more readily than unfilled PETG[22] | Difficult to sand or smooth; Polymaker limits post-processing to trimming or tumbling[20] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds it[22] | Cyanoacrylate bonds TPU; no common solvent welds it[20] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[22] | No practical vapour smoothing[20] |
| Support material pairing | Support for PLA or its own material (Bambu Lab)[1] | Polymaker warns TPU supports are often very difficult to remove[20] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Matte finish hides layer lines; stringing is reduced against unfilled PETG[1] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the matrix surface, 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it in a week.[32][33] | DMF, DMSO, NMP and THF dissolve TPU; acetone, MEK and cyclohexanone are partial solvents. All laboratory reagents.[34] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[32] | Toluene and benzene swell it up to +50 % by weight at 23 °C; esters swell it severely; ethanol and IPA soften it.[34] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane reaches only the resin, so the fibre is left standing proud of the surface. Controlled carcinogen.[33] | None practical — the true solvents (DMF, THF, NMP) are laboratory reagents and leave the joint swollen and weak.[34] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PETG-CF Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PETG Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- NinjaFlex 85A Technical Specifications NinjaTek · 2026-08 · tds
- Filaflex 82A product page (Shore hardness and elongation) Recreus · 2026-08 · vendor
- Ultrafuse TPU 85A Technical Data Sheet (Version 3.0) BASF Forward AM · 2022-08 · tds
- CarbonX Carbon Fiber PETG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU PETG-CF (PETG Carbon Fiber) 3D Printer Filament 1 kg SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fibreheart PETG-CF Pro Filament product page Siraya Tech · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI CF-PETG 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Carbon Fiber PETG Filament 1.75 mm, 1 kg Reli3D (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- PET-G CF15 Sakata 3D Filaments · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filament PM CFJet technical data sheet (TDS CFJet ENG.pdf) Filament PM (Plasty Mladec) · 2026-08 · tds
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Siraya Tech Flex TPU 85A Filament — product page Siraya Tech · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- add:north TPU Pro Matte 85A product page add:north · 2026-08 · vendor
- Flexible (TPE/TPU) — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- TPU — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Extrudr Product Catalogue (DURAPRO PA12 data block) Extrudr · 2025-03 · tds
- CARBONX PETG+CF — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- NinjaTek technical specs comparison chart (Cheetah, NinjaFlex, Armadillo, Alloy 910, Nylon 645) NinjaTek · 2026-08 · tds
- BambuLab TPU 95A HF vs Qidi TPU 95A HF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2024-02 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Elastollan — Chemical properties: swelling and chemical resistance BASF · 2026-08 · tds