Filament comparison
PETG-CF vs PP-GF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Carbon-fibre PETG (PETG-CF)PETG | Glass-fibre PP (PP-GF)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $29.99/kg median; $16.00–$74.22/kg across 11 dated product listings | $49.09/kg median; $46.27–$86.01/kg across 3 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PETG reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[1][2] | Polypropylene reinforced with chopped glass fibre[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.25 (Bambu Lab) to 1.34 (3DXTech), ISO 1183; Prusament 1.27[1][5][2] | 1.12 (Prusament PP Glass Fiber, ISO 1183) — the glass lifts it above water[3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 16–74; the middle of the market is about 29[1][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 49[13][14][15] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 16–74 across brands; ELEGOO 16 in a 5 kg pack, Reli3D 17, SUNLU 20, IEMAI 22, Siraya Tech 25, Bambu Lab 32, Sakata 3D 53, 3DXTech 67, Prusament 70, Filament PM 74 on 0.5 kg spools[16][1][17][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] | 46-86 across brands; BCN3D PP GF30 46 at 700 g, BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 49 at 2.2 kg, Prusament PP Glass Fiber 86 at 850 g[13][14][15] |
| Market availability1–5 | Stocked by most mainstream brands[1][17][6][16] | Available from several mainstream brands[13][14][15] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 and 1 kg spools[17][1] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 700 g, 850 g and 2.2 kg spools[13][14][15] |
| Typical applications | Stiff functional parts and fixtures where PETG's toughness is traded for rigidity and a matte finish[1][2] | Stiff, chemically resistant parts where PP-CF's cost or conductivity is unwanted[4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.02 (Prusament)[2] | ±0.04 (Prusament)[3] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 240–270 (Bambu Lab); 265 ± 10 (Prusament)[1][2] | 245 ± 10 (Prusament) — 25 °C below the carbon-fibre grade[3][18] |
| Bed temperature°C | 65–75 (Bambu Lab); 90 ± 10 (Prusament)[1][2] | 95 ± 10 (Prusament)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame fine; draught shield helps — Bambu Lab specifies a 35–50 °C chamber[1] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[19][20] |
| Recommended chamber temperature°C | 35–50 (Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Part cooling fan | 0–60 % (Bambu Lab); 50 % (Prusament)[1][2] | Off — Prusa runs 0 % except 100 % on bridges[3] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI or engineering plate with glue (Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 11.5 on My Tech Fun's Bambu Lab PETG-CF profile[21] | 4 at Prusa's 50 mm/s cap on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[3][22] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; Prusa recommends a brim[3] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive[1] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required[3] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Slight — the fibre reduces stringing against unfilled PETG[1][23] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; hardened nozzle mandatory[1] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[3] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Prusa states a hardened nozzle is necessary and recommends a brim[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required[1] | Hardened steel required[3] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[1] | Highly abrasive — standard GF composite[3] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; 3DXTech specifies a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers or higher, and Prusa lists composites as a higher clogging risk[24][25] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; Prusa lists higher risk of nozzle clogging for glass-filled composites[25] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[23] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | Hardened steel nozzle; no high-temperature hot-end needed[1][23] | Not documented |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Low — 0.30 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[1] | Low (0.1–0.3 %) — 0.11 % at both 24 h and 7 days, higher than the carbon-fibre grade's 0.04 % but still very low[3][18] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.30 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); Prusa measures 0.10 after 7 days at 22 % RH[1][2] | 0.11 after 24 h and 0.11 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[3] |
| Drying temperature & time | 65 °C for 8 h (Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[26] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | No dry-versus-conditioned figures published; Bambu Lab states PETG-CF must be properly dried before printing and stored dry after use[1][26] | Not applicable in practice at 0.11 % equilibrium uptake[3] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Bambu Lab says store dry after use[1][26] | No special storage needed[3] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 35 ± 5 (Bambu Lab) and 47 ± 2 at yield (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527; 56 at break for 3DXTech[1][2][5] | 46.6 ± 1.3 filament tensile yield (Prusament, ISO 527) — more than double the carbon-fibre grade's 21[3][18] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2460 ± 230 (Bambu Lab) and 1700 (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527[1][2] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 4.3 at yield (Prusament, printed XY, ISO 527); 3 at break for 3DXTech[2][5] | Not documented |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 68 ± 3 printed horizontal, ISO 178 (Prusament)[2] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 2300 printed horizontal, 3100 printed vertical, ISO 178 (Prusament)[2] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | Not documented | 7.9 ± 0.4 printed horizontal and 9.9 ± 0.8 printed vertical XZ (ISO 179-1, notched)[3] |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 29 ± 6 printed horizontal and 43 ± 8 printed vertical (Prusament, ISO 179-1); Izod 4.91 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun bars[2][21] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 29 ± 4 printed Z (Bambu Lab, ISO 527); 18 ± 3 by Prusa's interlayer adhesion test; 10.7 on My Tech Fun bars[1][2][21] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning[5] | Moderate[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 77 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method)[2] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded unfilled PP stock (ASTM D785); no figure is published for a glass-fibre PP filament[27] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 16.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, less than plain PETG's 19.4[21] | Not documented |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Moderate — no CF-grade S-N curve; unfilled printed PETG ran 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength[28] | Not documented |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rigid[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 83 (Bambu Lab, printed Z against XY tensile)[1] | Not documented |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 74 (Bambu Lab) and 96 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[1][2] | 138.3 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa)[3] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa[1][2] | 112.6 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[3] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (3DXTech), DSC[1][5] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | 225 melting (Bambu Lab, DSC) — the carbon fibre lets the PET fraction crystallise[1] | Not documented |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 77 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 61 for Bambu Lab PETG Basic[21] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published[1] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Moderate — a season or two; the carbon fibre does not add UV stabilisation[29] | Not documented |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure, as for unfilled PETG[29] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents[20] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Not documented | Excellent — essentially unaffected[3] |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact[29] | Not documented |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[29] | Not documented |
| Recyclability | Fibre-filled PETG is not accepted in household plastic collection[29] | Not documented |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10⁹ ohm/sq — carbon fibre at this loading is not static-dissipative (3DXTech)[5] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[30] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[30] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[30] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[30] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[5] | Glass fibre is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[3] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands to a matte finish more readily than unfilled PETG[23] | Not documented |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds it[23] | Not documented |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[23] | Not documented |
| Support material pairing | Support for PLA or its own material (Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Matte finish hides layer lines; stringing is reduced against unfilled PETG[1] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the matrix surface, 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it in a week.[31][32] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves the matrix at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C, leaving the fibre.[33][34] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[31] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[33] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane reaches only the resin, so the fibre is left standing proud of the surface. Controlled carcinogen.[32] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[33] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PETG-CF Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PETG Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- CarbonX Carbon Fiber PETG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU PETG-CF (PETG Carbon Fiber) 3D Printer Filament 1 kg SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fibreheart PETG-CF Pro Filament product page Siraya Tech · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI CF-PETG 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Carbon Fiber PETG Filament 1.75 mm, 1 kg Reli3D (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- PET-G CF15 Sakata 3D Filaments · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filament PM CFJet technical data sheet (TDS CFJet ENG.pdf) Filament PM (Plasty Mladec) · 2026-08 · tds
- BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 2.200 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- BCN3D PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 700 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusa Prusament PP Glass Fiber Natural (NFC), 1.75 mm / 850 g 3DJAKE · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- CARBONX PETG+CF — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper