Filament comparison
PEEK-CF vs PP
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Fibre-reinforced PEEKHIGHTEMP | Polypropylene (PP)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $597.50/kg median; $448.00–$695.00/kg across 5 dated product listings | $46.56/kg median; $31.99–$53.00/kg across 4 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Short-fibre reinforced PEEK. 3DXTech's CarbonX grade is nominally 10 wt% carbon and its FibreX grade 20 wt% glass; LEHVOSS Luvocom 3F PEEK CF 9676 is 15 wt% carbon; Ensinger's machining stock runs to 30 wt% carbon[1][2][3][4] | Polypropylene — a semi-crystalline polyolefin with no polar groups, so it neither absorbs water nor bonds to most bed surfaces[5][6] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.39 (ISO 1183)[1] | 0.91 (Prusa PP composite, ISO 1183) — the lightest common filament[7] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 448–972; the middle of the market is about 598[2][3][8] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 27–53; the middle of the market is about 44[9][10][11][12] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 448-972 across formats and filler types; IEMAI 3D CF-PEEK and GF-PEEK 448 at 1 kg, 3DXTech CarbonX PEEK+CF10 598 at 2 kg and FibreX PEEK+GF20 695 at 1 kg, Luvocom 3F PEEK CF 9676 648 at 2 kg[2][3][8][13] | 27–53 across brands; Reli3D 32 on Amazon, SUNLU 44 at 0.8 kg, Fiberlogy 49 at 750 g, IEMAI 3D 53, and the 3DJake PP listing spans 27–49[9][14][10][11][12] |
| Market availability1–5 | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[2][3] | Available from several mainstream brands[14][10][9] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 200 g to 2 kg spools[2][3] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 kg spools are common[10] |
| Typical applications | Stiff aerospace and oil-and-gas parts where PEEK alone is not rigid enough[1] | Living hinges, chemical-resistant containers, automotive clips and packaging prototypes[5] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | Not documented | 210–230 (Braskem-type PE/PP window); Formfutura's Centaur PP melts at 205 ± 15 °C[5] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Actively heated chamber required[15][16] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[17][6] |
| Part cooling fan | Not documented | Part cooling fan required (Simplify3D)[17] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Not documented | Packing tape, a polypropylene sheet, or a PP-specific adhesive such as Magigoo PP — ordinary PLA and ABS adhesives do not hold it[17][6] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Moderate — needs adhesion aid or draught shield; the fibre cuts PEEK's crystallisation shrinkage[1] | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; PP's crystallinity drives shrinkage and Prusa recommends a brim on its PP grades[7][18] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Not documented | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required. PP bonds to almost nothing; a polypropylene-specific tape or adhesive is the normal answer[7][6] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Not documented | Slight — Polymaker advises 1–2 mm retraction at 20–30 mm/s[6] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Expert / industrial hardware only[15][16] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; bed adhesion is the whole problem[6][7] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required[1] | Brass fine indefinitely for unfilled grades — Simplify3D states no special hotend is required[17] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[1] | Non-abrasive when unfilled[17] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | High — jams from moisture, heat creep or particles; 3DXTech adds a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers to the mandatory 120 °C pre-dry[19][20] | Low — Simplify3D lists no special hotend requirement for PP and clogging is not among its listed drawbacks[21][17] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Not documented | Slightly sensitive[17] |
| Hotend requirement | Not documented | No special hot-end required (Simplify3D)[17] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Not documented | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[7] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.06 in 24 h on extruded CF30 stock (ASTM D570)[4] | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers, measured on its PP composite)[7] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | No drying step is published for PP; uptake is below the level that affects printing[7] |
| Symptoms when wet | Not documented | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle; Polymaker still advises a 70 °C dry for 4–6 h despite the low uptake[6] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | No dry-versus-conditioned figures are published; 3DXTech mandates a 120 °C, 4 h pre-dry before every print because trapped water flashes to steam at these nozzle temperatures[19] | Not applicable in practice — with equilibrium uptake at 0.04 %, there is no moisture-driven strength loss to measure. Polymaker's sensitivity tiers put polyolefins below even PLA[7][21] |
| Storage requirement | Not documented | No special storage needed[7] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 105 at break (printed XY, ISO 527, CF10); 121 at yield on extruded CF30 stock (ASTM D638)[1][4] | 12 at yield (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[5] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 8100 (printed XY, ISO 527, CF10) — more than double unfilled PEEK; 6343 on extruded CF30 stock (ASTM D638)[1][4] | 724 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D638; converted from 105,000 psi)[22] |
| Elongation at break% | 3 at break (printed XY, ISO 527), against 28 for unfilled PEEK[1][23] | Above 600 at break (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[5] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 136 (printed XY, ISO 178, CF10); 193 on extruded CF30 stock (ASTM D790)[1][4] | 31.0 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D790; converted from 4500 psi)[22] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 8300 (printed XY, ISO 178, CF10); 7171 on extruded CF30 stock (ASTM D790)[1][4] | 402 flexural modulus (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D790) — an order of magnitude below any rigid filament[5] |
| Other impact data | Izod notched 61.9 J/m on extruded CF30 stock, converted from 1.16 ft-lb/in (ASTM D256)[4] | Izod notched 112 J/m on extruded PP stock, converted from 2.1 ft-lb/in (ASTM D256)[22] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning; elongation falls from 28 % to 3 %[1][23] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[5] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | Rockwell M107 on extruded PEEK-CF30 stock (ASTM D785), against M100 unfilled[4][24] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded PP stock (ASTM D785)[22] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Excellent — holds load for years. Ensinger rates carbon-fibre PEEK stock as very highly creep resistant and specifies 260 °C continuous service[4] | Below average[5] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good. Victrex rates PEEK for long-term fatigue as well as creep; the fibre cuts elongation at break from 28 % to 3 %, which limits repeated large-strain flexing[25][1][23] | Excellent — living hinges viable, the classic polypropylene application[5] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Semi-flexible[5] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 265 (printed XY, ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa, CarbonX PEEK+CF10) against 140 for unfilled PEEK[1][23] | 74 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D648 at 66 psi; converted from 165 °F)[22] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 316 on extruded CF30 stock, converted from 600 °F at 264 psi (ASTM D648)[4] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 143 (DSC, CarbonX PEEK+CF10) — the fibre does not move the glass transition[1] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | 334 melting on extruded CF30 stock, converted from 633 °F[4] | 205 ± 15 melting (Formfutura Centaur PP)[5] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 260 long-term on extruded CF30 stock, converted from 500 °F; 300 short term[4] | Bounded by a melting point of 205 ± 15 °C and by the 158 °C heat deflection of the carbon-filled grade; no loaded-bar service figure is published for unfilled PP[5][7] |
| Thermal expansion (CTE)µm/m·K | 14.4 (extruded PEEK-CF30 stock, ASTM D696; source states 0.80e-5 in/in/°F) — about a third of unfilled PEEK[4][24] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | UL 94 V-0 on the base resin; Ensinger lists extruded PEEK-CF30 stock as inherently flame resistant[23][4] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for the grades surveyed[7] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Not documented | Months outdoors before embrittlement — unstabilised polypropylene chalks under UV[6] |
| Chemical resistance | Not documented | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents — the usual reason to choose PP[6] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Not documented | Excellent — essentially unaffected[7] |
| Food contact | Not documented | Polypropylene is a common food-packaging polymer, but no filament here carries a food-contact certification[6] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not documented | Not biodegradable[6] |
| Recyclability | Not documented | Mechanically recyclable as resin code 5, but printed waste is not accepted in household collection[6] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10⁹ ohm/sq — not static-dissipative (ASTM D257)[1] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised. None of these polymers was in the chamber study, and all are processed far above the temperatures it covered[26] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[26] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Ventilated room or enclosure recommended[26] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[26] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[1] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Not documented | Sands poorly — the waxy surface loads abrasive paper[17] |
| Painting & finishing | Not documented | Paint and adhesives do not key to untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is normally needed first[6] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Not documented | Nothing common bonds untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is needed before adhesives key[6] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | Not documented | No practical vapour smoothing[17] |
| Support material pairing | Not documented | Prints its own supports; no soluble support is rated for PP[17] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Not documented | Shrinkage and warping dominate; the low modulus means parts flex rather than hold tolerance[7] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | 95–98 wt% sulphuric acid dissolves the matrix at 40–70 °C and leaves the fibre. Nothing else touches PEEK.[27][28] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves it at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C — the xylene-solubles route.[29][30] |
| Softened or crazed by | Concentrated nitric, hydrofluoric, hydrobromic and hydriodic acids attack it; DCM, DMSO and THF swell thin-walled sections.[31][28] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[29] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | None — no solvent softens PEEK, so parts are joined thermally or mechanically, never chemically.[31][28] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[29] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- CarbonX Carbon Fiber PEEK Technical Data Sheet v3 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3D4Makers product catalogue 3D4Makers · 2026-08 · vendor
- TECAPEEK CF30 black (PEEK-CF30) — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- IEMAI 3D CF-PEEK 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU product catalogue SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy PP Natural — product page 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Low Warp PP Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI 3D PP 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI 3D GF-PEEK 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- PP filament listing 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PEI 1010 Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-09 · tds
- Prusament PEI 1010 — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- CARBONX PEEK+CF10 — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- ThermaX PEEK Technical Data Sheet v3 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- TECAPEEK natural (PEEK) — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- PEEK polymers — product overview Victrex · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- The Effects of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Ion Exchange Preparation Conditions on Membrane Properties Yee, Zhang & Ladewig, Membranes 3(3) 182–195 · 2013-07 · paper
- Chemical resistance — resistance of Ensinger plastics to chemicals (DIN 50 014, 23/50) Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- What solvents are not compatible with PEEK? — fluidics technical FAQ IDEX Health & Science · 2026-08 · doc