Filament comparison
PCTG vs PETG-CF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PCTGPETG | Carbon-fibre PETG (PETG-CF)PETG |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $34.99/kg median; $14.00–$50.67/kg across 5 dated product listings | $29.99/kg median; $16.00–$74.22/kg across 11 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) glycol — a copolyester with a higher cyclohexanedimethanol content than PETG[1][2] | PETG reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.23 (Extrudr, ASTM D792; 3DXTech, ISO 1183)[2][5] | 1.25 (Bambu Lab) to 1.34 (3DXTech), ISO 1183; Prusament 1.27[3][6][4] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 34[7][5][8] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 16–74; the middle of the market is about 29[3][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 14–51 across brands; CHCKX 14 in a 10-roll bundle, Push Plastic 30, Proto-pasta 35 at 1 kg, 3DXTech 51[7][5][16] | 16–74 across brands; ELEGOO 16 in a 5 kg pack, Reli3D 17, SUNLU 20, IEMAI 22, Siraya Tech 25, Bambu Lab 32, Sakata 3D 53, 3DXTech 67, Prusament 70, Filament PM 74 on 0.5 kg spools[17][3][18][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[7][5][8][19] | Stocked by most mainstream brands[3][18][9][17] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.5, 0.75, 1, 3 and 5 kg spools[7][8][5] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 and 1 kg spools[18][3] |
| Typical applications | Transparent covers, guards and impact-loaded parts where PETG cracks[1][2] | Stiff functional parts and fixtures where PETG's toughness is traded for rigidity and a matte finish[3][4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | Not documented | ±0.02 (Prusament)[4] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 250–270 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | 240–270 (Bambu Lab); 265 ± 10 (Prusament)[3][4] |
| Bed temperature°C | 60–100 (Spectrum)[1] | 65–75 (Bambu Lab); 90 ± 10 (Prusament)[3][4] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine — Spectrum and Extrudr both say a closed chamber is not necessary, Extrudr adds it helps on larger parts[1][2] | Open frame fine; draught shield helps — Bambu Lab specifies a 35–50 °C chamber[3] |
| Recommended chamber temperature°C | Not documented | 35–50 (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Part cooling fan | Up to 100 % (Spectrum); 20–50 % (Extrudr)[1][2] | 0–60 % (Bambu Lab); 50 % (Prusament)[3][4] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets; on smooth PEI a glue stick acts as a release agent[20][21] | Textured PEI or engineering plate with glue (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 1.6–16 at the 20–200 mm/s Extrudr rates the material for, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[2][22] | 11.5 on My Tech Fun's Bambu Lab PETG-CF profile[23] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[20][21] | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive[3] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker names stringing as PETG's common quirk[21] | Slight — the fibre reduces stringing against unfilled PETG[3][24] |
| Shrinkage% | 0.2–0.5 (Extrudr, ASTM D955)[2] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning[1][2] | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; hardened nozzle mandatory[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely — Extrudr explicitly states no hardened nozzle is needed[2] | Hardened steel required[3] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[2] | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[3] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — 3DXTech lists no special nozzle concerns and no minimum layer height for PCTG, only a 65 °C pre-dry[25] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; 3DXTech specifies a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers or higher, and Prusa lists composites as a higher clogging risk[26][27] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[24] | Slightly sensitive[24] |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[24] | Hardened steel nozzle; no high-temperature hot-end needed[3][24] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — the copolyester matrix reaches 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH and 3DXTech specifies a 65 °C, 4 h pre-dry[20][25] | Low — 0.30 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | Not documented | 0.30 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); Prusa measures 0.10 after 7 days at 22 % RH[3][4] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | 65 °C for 8 h (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[28] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[28] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic; no dry-versus-conditioned strength figures are published for this grade and the loss shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[28] | No dry-versus-conditioned figures published; Bambu Lab states PETG-CF must be properly dried before printing and stored dry after use[3][28] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[28][21] | Sealed with desiccant; Bambu Lab says store dry after use[3][28] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 43–44 at yield and 45–46 at break (ISO 527, injection-moulded resin data from Spectrum and Extrudr); 48 on My Tech Fun printed bars[1][2][29] | 35 ± 5 (Bambu Lab) and 47 ± 2 at yield (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527; 56 at break for 3DXTech[3][4][6] |
| Young's modulusMPa | Not documented | 2460 ± 230 (Bambu Lab) and 1700 (Prusament) printed XY, ISO 527[3][4] |
| Elongation at break% | 215–220 at break on moulded specimens (ISO 527); 4.3–4.4 at yield[1][2] | 4.3 at yield (Prusament, printed XY, ISO 527); 3 at break for 3DXTech[4][6] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | Not documented | 68 ± 3 printed horizontal, ISO 178 (Prusament)[4] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | Not documented | 2300 printed horizontal, 3100 printed vertical, ISO 178 (Prusament)[4] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 93–94 notched Izod at 23 °C on moulded specimens (ISO 180); 3DXTech quotes 8 by ISO 180/A[1][2][5] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Izod 4.14 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars, against 3.37 for PETG on the same rig[29] | Charpy unnotched 29 ± 6 printed horizontal and 43 ± 8 printed vertical (Prusament, ISO 179-1); Izod 4.91 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun bars[4][23] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 21.6 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm printed bars, against 32.9 for PETG[29] | 29 ± 4 printed Z (Bambu Lab, ISO 527); 18 ± 3 by Prusa's interlayer adhesion test; 10.7 on My Tech Fun bars[3][4][23] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[1][2] | Brittle — snaps with little warning[6] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 69 Shore D measured by My Tech Fun, against 72 for PETG[29] | 77 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method)[4] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 19.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, slightly worse than PETG's 18.2[29] | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 16.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, less than plain PETG's 19.4[23] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good — 215 % elongation at break and 94 kJ/m² notched Izod on moulded specimens (Extrudr, Spectrum)[1][2] | Moderate — no CF-grade S-N curve; unfilled printed PETG ran 79 000–193 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength[30] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[29] | Rigid[3] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | Not documented | 83 (Bambu Lab, printed Z against XY tensile)[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 74 (Bambu Lab) and 96 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[3][4] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | Not documented | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (Prusament), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa[3][4] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 78 (3DXTech, DSC)[5] | 68 (Bambu Lab) and 80 (3DXTech), DSC[3][6] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 88 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | 225 melting (Bambu Lab, DSC) — the carbon fibre lets the PET fraction crystallise[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 68 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 65 for PETG[29] | 77 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 61 for Bambu Lab PETG Basic[23] |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard grades[31] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published[3] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Not documented | Moderate — a season or two; the carbon fibre does not add UV stabilisation[21] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure[21] | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure, as for unfilled PETG[21] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — minor absorption; Spectrum describes the polymer as hydrophobic[1] | Not documented |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact as filament[21] | Not certified for food contact[21] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[21] | Not biodegradable[21] |
| Recyclability | Not accepted in household plastic collection[21] | Fibre-filled PETG is not accepted in household plastic collection[21] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10¹³ ohm/sq — insulating (3DXTech, ASTM D257)[5] | Surface resistance above 10⁹ ohm/sq — carbon fibre at this loading is not static-dissipative (3DXTech)[6] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[32] | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[32] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[32] | Open a window / occasional ventilation[32] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Not documented | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[6] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[24] | Sands to a matte finish more readily than unfilled PETG[24] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[24] | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds it[24] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[24] | No practical vapour smoothing[24] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[24] | Support for PLA or its own material (Bambu Lab)[3] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Optical clarity is the selling point; Extrudr recommends a layer height at most 50 % of nozzle diameter[2] | Matte finish hides layer lines; stringing is reduced against unfilled PETG[3] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; Eastman's CHDM copolyester data shows 1,2-dichloroethane destroying it within a week.[33] | No common workshop solvent; dichloromethane — a carcinogen — dissolves the matrix surface, 1,2-dichloroethane destroys it in a week.[33][34] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften the copolyester; methanol crazes it (Eastman, 1 y at 23 °C).[33] | Acetone (+16 % weight over 1 year at 23 °C), ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften it; methanol crazes it.[33] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[34] | Dichloromethane reaches only the resin, so the fibre is left standing proud of the surface. Controlled carcinogen.[34] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Spectrum Premium PCTG Technical Data Sheet Spectrum Filaments · 2026-08 · tds
- Extrudr PCTG technical data Extrudr · 2026-08 · tds
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet — PETG-CF Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PETG Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- MAX-G PCTG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- CarbonX Carbon Fiber PETG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU PETG-CF (PETG Carbon Fiber) 3D Printer Filament 1 kg SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fibreheart PETG-CF Pro Filament product page Siraya Tech · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI CF-PETG 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Carbon Fiber PETG Filament 1.75 mm, 1 kg Reli3D (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- PET-G CF15 Sakata 3D Filaments · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filament PM CFJet technical data sheet (TDS CFJet ENG.pdf) Filament PM (Plasty Mladec) · 2026-08 · tds
- CHCKX 10KG Multicolor PCTG Filament bundle CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- ELEGOO product catalogue ELEGOO · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Atomic Filament product catalogue Atomic Filament · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PETG Basic vs Translucent vs PETG-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- MAX-G PCTG — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- CARBONX PETG+CF — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc