Filament comparison
PC-CF vs PCTG
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Carbon-fibre PC (PC-CF)PC | PCTGPETG |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $62.58/kg median; $34.99–$117.33/kg across 6 dated product listings | $34.99/kg median; $14.00–$50.67/kg across 5 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Polycarbonate reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[1][2] | Poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) glycol — a copolyester with a higher cyclohexanedimethanol content than PETG[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.22 (Prusament) and 1.36 (3DXTech), ISO 1183[1][2] | 1.23 (Extrudr, ASTM D792; 3DXTech, ISO 1183)[4][5] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 35–117; the middle of the market is about 63[6][7][8][9][10] | 1 kg spools cluster near 34[11][5][12] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 35–117 across brands; Ambrosia 35, IEMAI 39, YXPOLYER 55, Spectrum PC CF 70, Prusament 94, 3DXTech 117[6][7][8][9][10] | 14–51 across brands; CHCKX 14 in a 10-roll bundle, Push Plastic 30, Proto-pasta 35 at 1 kg, 3DXTech 51[11][5][13] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[6][8][14] | Available from several mainstream brands[11][5][12][15] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75, 0.8 and 1 kg spools[6][8] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.5, 0.75, 1, 3 and 5 kg spools[11][12][5] |
| Typical applications | Stiff high-temperature structural parts — jigs, drone frames and under-bonnet brackets[1][2] | Transparent covers, guards and impact-loaded parts where PETG cracks[3][4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.04 (Prusament PC Blend Carbon Fiber)[1] | Not documented |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 285 ± 10 (Prusament)[1] | 250–270 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[3][4] |
| Bed temperature°C | 110 ± 10 (Prusament)[1] | 60–100 (Spectrum)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Enclosure required (passive)[1][16] | Open frame is fine — Spectrum and Extrudr both say a closed chamber is not necessary, Extrudr adds it helps on larger parts[3][4] |
| Part cooling fan | Off — Prusa allows 0–20 % and warns cooling significantly reduces interlayer adhesion[1] | Up to 100 % (Spectrum); 20–50 % (Extrudr)[3][4] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | PEI with a glue stick or a commercial adhesive[17] | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets; on smooth PEI a glue stick acts as a release agent[18][19] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | Not documented | 1.6–16 at the 20–200 mm/s Extrudr rates the material for, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[4][20] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; the fibre reduces warping against unfilled PC[1][16] | Not documented |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs a specific surface plus adhesive[17][21] | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[18][19] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker flags stringing as a common PC problem[21] | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker names stringing as PETG's common quirk[19] |
| Shrinkage% | Not documented | 0.2–0.5 (Extrudr, ASTM D955)[4] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[16][1] | Easy — minor profile tuning[3][4] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required[16] | Brass fine indefinitely — Extrudr explicitly states no hardened nozzle is needed[4] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[16] | Non-abrasive[4] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | High — jams from moisture, heat creep or particles; PC already absorbs water from the air and 3DXTech adds a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle, 0.25 mm layers and a 120 °C pre-dry[22][17][23] | Low — 3DXTech lists no special nozzle concerns and no minimum layer height for PCTG, only a 65 °C pre-dry[24] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[17] | Slightly sensitive[25] |
| Hotend requirement | All-metal hot end required (Simplify3D)[17] | No special hot-end required[25] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Low (0.1–0.3 %) — the PC matrix takes up 0.15–0.25 % and 3DXTech specifies a 120 °C, 4 h pre-dry[26][27][22] | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — the copolyester matrix reaches 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH and 3DXTech specifies a 65 °C, 4 h pre-dry[18][24] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.11 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[1] | Not documented |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[28] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[28] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | No dry-versus-conditioned figures are published. Polymaker calls PC highly hygroscopic and requires a 70–80 °C dry for 6–8 h; run wet, the loss shows as surface defects and poor layer adhesion[21][28] | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic; no dry-versus-conditioned strength figures are published for this grade and the loss shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[28] |
| Storage requirement | Airtight containers with desiccant to prevent reabsorption[21] | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[28][19] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 64 ± 3 printed horizontal and 70 ± 3 printed vertical at yield, ISO 527-1 (Prusament); 3DXTech quotes 73 at break[1][2] | 43–44 at yield and 45–46 at break (ISO 527, injection-moulded resin data from Spectrum and Extrudr); 48 on My Tech Fun printed bars[3][4][29] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2600 printed horizontal and 3200 printed vertical, ISO 527-1 (Prusament); 3DXTech quotes 6980[1][2] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 4.6 at yield printed horizontal (Prusament); 3DXTech quotes 2.1 at break[1][2] | 215–220 at break on moulded specimens (ISO 527); 4.3–4.4 at yield[3][4] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 94 ± 3 printed horizontal and 130 ± 2 printed vertical, ISO 178 (Prusament); 3DXTech quotes 85[1][2] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 3500 printed horizontal and 4200 printed vertical, ISO 178 (Prusament); 3DXTech quotes 6540[1][2] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 12 ± 1 printed horizontal and 17 ± 2 printed vertical, ISO 179-1 notched (Prusament)[1] | 93–94 notched Izod at 23 °C on moulded specimens (ISO 180); 3DXTech quotes 8 by ISO 180/A[3][4][5] |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 32 ± 5 printed horizontal and 35 ± 4 printed vertical (Prusament, ISO 179-1)[1] | Izod 4.14 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars, against 3.37 for PETG on the same rig[29] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 23 ± 2 (Prusa Polymers interlayer adhesion test) — above the 21 ± 2 of unfilled Prusament PC Blend[1][27] | 21.6 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm printed bars, against 32.9 for PETG[29] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Moderate[1][2] | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[3][4] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 83 Shore D (Prusa Polymers method), against 79 for unfilled Prusament PC Blend[1][27] | 69 Shore D measured by My Tech Fun, against 72 for PETG[29] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Excellent — holds load for years. Room-temperature tensile creep of moulded unfilled PC ran unbroken at 41 MPa until the test was stopped; short carbon fibre raises the flexural modulus from about 2.1 to 3.5-6.5 GPa, which reduces creep strain further[30][1] | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 19.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, slightly worse than PETG's 18.2[29] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good. No fatigue test data was found for a carbon-fibre PC filament; the unfilled polymer is rated Good on the same scale[30] | Good — 215 % elongation at break and 94 kJ/m² notched Izod on moulded specimens (Extrudr, Spectrum)[3][4] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Slightly flexible in thin sections[29] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 114 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa, Prusament)[1] | Not documented |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 106 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa, Prusament), against 93 for unfilled Prusament PC Blend[1][27] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 127 (3DXTech, DSC)[2] | 78 (3DXTech, DSC)[5] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Not documented | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 88 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[3][4] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 113 — Prusa publishes this as the temperature resistance of Prusament PC Blend[27] | 68 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 65 for PETG[29] |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Not documented | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard grades[31] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors unless stabilised[21] | Not documented |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands oils, solvents and fuels; Polymaker rates it good against weak acids[21] | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure[19] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Not documented | Good — minor absorption; Spectrum describes the polymer as hydrophobic[3] |
| Food contact | Bisphenol-A polycarbonate is not offered as food-contact filament[21] | Not certified for food contact as filament[19] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[21] | Not biodegradable[19] |
| Recyclability | Mechanically recyclable but not accepted in household plastic collection[21] | Not accepted in household plastic collection[19] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10⁹ ohm/sq — not static-dissipative (3DXTech, ASTM D257)[2] | Surface resistance above 10¹³ ohm/sq — insulating (3DXTech, ASTM D257)[5] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[32] | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[32] |
| Ultrafine-particle emission rateparticles/min | ≈4 × 10¹⁰ median — the highest ultrafine-particle rate of the nine filaments in the chamber study, above every ABS tested[32] | Not documented |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Ventilated room or enclosure recommended[32][16] | Open a window / occasional ventilation[32] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[2] | Not documented |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands and machines well; the toughness means it cuts rather than chips[17] | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[25] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; dichloromethane solvent-welds PC but is a laboratory reagent[17] | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[25] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[17] | No practical vapour smoothing[25] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; 3DXTech sells a dedicated PC break-away support[17] | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[25] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Not documented | Optical clarity is the selling point; Extrudr recommends a layer height at most 50 % of nozzle diameter[4] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Dichloromethane and chloroform dissolve the matrix and leave the fibre; DMF and dioxane do the same (Covestro).[33] | No common workshop solvent; Eastman's CHDM copolyester data shows 1,2-dichloroethane destroying it within a week.[34] |
| Softened or crazed by | Methanol, butyl acetate, ether, 1 % NaOH and phthalate plasticisers stress-crack it; acetone, MEK and xylene swell it.[33] | Acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften the copolyester; methanol crazes it (Eastman, 1 y at 23 °C).[34] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane cement welds the resin, but the fibre keeps the joint from flowing closed. Controlled carcinogen.[35] | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[36] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PC Blend Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v2.0 Prusa Polymers · 2023-04 · tds
- CarbonX Carbon Fiber ezPC Polycarbonate Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Spectrum Premium PCTG Technical Data Sheet Spectrum Filaments · 2026-08 · tds
- Extrudr PCTG technical data Extrudr · 2026-08 · tds
- MAX-G PCTG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- Spectrum PC CF Carbon Black, 1.75 mm / 250 g 3DJAKE · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI CF-PC 3D Printing Filament product page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- YXPOLYER PC CF product page YXPOLYER · 2026-08 · vendor
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX 10KG Multicolor PCTG Filament bundle CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- Filastruder product catalogue Filastruder · 2026-08 · vendor
- Atomic Filament product catalogue Atomic Filament · 2026-08 · vendor
- ABS / ASA / PC Usage Guide Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Polycarbonate — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PC — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- CARBONX ezPC+CF — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- MAX-G PCTG — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V2.0 — PC Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PC Blend Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Experimental data for creep and dynamic mechanical properties of polycarbonate and polycarbonate/ABS Data in Brief 42:108264 · 2022-06 · paper
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Makrolon — The chemical resistance (Makrolon 2800, 6 days at 23 °C and 50 °C) Covestro · 2016-12 · tds
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Weld-On 3 Acrylic Plastic Cement — technical data sheet (shipped as dichloromethane) IPS Corporation · 2002-07 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc