Filament comparison
LW-PLA vs Magnetic
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Lightweight / foaming PLA (LW-PLA)PLA | Magnetic filamentSPECIALTY |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $47.48/kg median; $37.49–$50.00/kg across 4 dated product listings | $64.99/kg median; $64.99–$64.99/kg across 1 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PLA with a blowing agent. Two distinct types: active-foaming grades that expand at the nozzle (Bambu Lab PLA Aero, colorFabb LW-PLA) and pre-foamed grades that do not (Polymaker PolyLite LW-PLA, PolyWood)[1][2][3][4] | PLA loaded with ferromagnetic iron powder, so printed parts respond to magnets[5] |
| Densityg/cm³ | Filament 1.21 (Bambu Lab) and 1.24 (colorFabb); pre-foamed filament 0.8 (PolyWood, at 21.5 °C) and 0.9 (Polymaker LW-PLA); foamed prints reach 0.40[1][2][3][4] | About 1.85 (Proto-pasta manufacturer figure) — 1.5× standard PLA[5] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 45[6][2][7] | 1 kg spools cluster near 65[8] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 37–50 across brands; Polymaker LW-PLA 37, Bambu Lab Aero 45, colorFabb 50, PolyWood 50[7][6][2] | 64–70 across formats; 1 kg spool 65, 500 g 70, 2 kg 70[8] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[6][7][2] | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[8] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.6, 0.75, 0.8 and 1 kg spools[7][2] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 kg spools[8] |
| Typical applications | RC aircraft, drone airframes and large props where mass matters more than strength[1][2] | Sensor targets, magnetic fixtures, and props that need to stick to a magnet or rust deliberately[5] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 210–260 (Bambu Lab, foaming); 195–260 (colorFabb, foaming); 190–210 (Polymaker, pre-foamed)[1][2][3] | 192 (Proto-pasta)[5] |
| Bed temperature°C | 35–45 (Bambu Lab); 50–60 (colorFabb); 25–60 (Polymaker)[1][2][3] | 60 (Proto-pasta)[5] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[3] | Open frame is fine[5] |
| Part cooling fan | Fan on[1][3] | Not documented |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 3.2–8 at the 40–100 mm/s colorFabb specifies and the 50–100 mm/s Polymaker specifies, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[3][2][9] | 1.6–2.4 at Proto-pasta's 20–30 mm/s on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[5] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; flow has to be cut to match the expansion[2] | Intermediate — dry filament and a tuned profile; slow, and brittle in filament form[5] |
| Extruder requirement | Bambu Lab PLA Aero is 0.4 mm nozzle only on the store and wiki, while its own TDS lists 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8[1][10] | Proto-pasta advises an extrusion width 0.05 mm larger than the nozzle and warns feeding is inconsistent below 0.4 mm and on Bowden machines[5] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[3][4] | Brass acceptable; hardened steel for volume work[5] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[3][4] | Moderately abrasive — metal fill[5] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | High — jams from moisture, heat creep or particles; Bambu Lab warns the foamed extrudate swells and easily clogs the nozzle, and rules out 0.2 mm nozzles[10] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; Prusa lists metal-filled composites as a higher clogging risk and recommends a 0.6 mm nozzle minimum[11] |
| Hotend requirement | Not documented | Proto-pasta recommends a wear-resistant or larger nozzle for longer service intervals[5] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate — 0.45 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); 0.40 % equilibrium (Polymaker)[1][3] | Not documented |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.45 saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH (Bambu Lab); 0.40 equilibrium (Polymaker)[1][3] | Not documented |
| Drying temperature & time | 55 °C for 6–8 h[1][3] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures for this grade; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[12] | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[12] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 24 ± 2 (Bambu Lab) and 24.4 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527; colorFabb falls from 43.1 unfoamed to 10.8 at 45 % flow[1][3][2] | Not documented |
| Young's modulusMPa | 1350 ± 250 (Bambu Lab) and 1689 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527; colorFabb falls from 3334 unfoamed to 864 foamed[1][3][2] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 2.6 ± 0.7 (Bambu Lab) and 8.8 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 527[1][3] | Not documented |
| Flexural strengthMPa | 45 ± 4 (Bambu Lab) and 50.2 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 178[1][3] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 1690 ± 120 (Bambu Lab) and 1959 (Polymaker) printed XY, ISO 178[1][3] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 8.2 ± 0.7 printed XY, ISO 179, notched (Bambu Lab); colorFabb 3.67 foamed[1][2] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Charpy unnotched 28.8 printed XY (Bambu Lab); colorFabb 5.46 foamed[1][2] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 18 ± 3 printed Z, ISO 527 (Bambu Lab); flexural Z collapses to 17 against 45 in XY[1] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Brittle — snaps with little warning; elongation at break 2.6 % in XY and 1.2 % in Z[1] | Brittle — Proto-pasta describes the filament as more brittle than standard PLA and needing extra care in handling[5] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Poor — no foamed-grade creep test; plain printed PLA sagged from 12 to 16.2–21.8 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, and the foam carries less solid[13][14][15] | Not documented |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Poor — no grade-specific S-N curve; plain printed PLA ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength and elongation at break falls to 2.6 % in XY and 1.2 % in Z[16][1] | Not documented |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Rigid[5] |
| Z strength as % of XY% | 75 by tensile, 38 by flexural (printed, Bambu Lab)[1] | Not documented |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 53 (Bambu Lab) and 54 (Polymaker), ISO 75 at 0.45 MPa[1][3] | Not documented |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 48 (Bambu Lab) and 50 (Polymaker), ISO 75 at 1.8 MPa[1][3] | Not documented |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 55 (Bambu Lab) and 59 (Polymaker), DSC[1][3] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | 150 peak melt (Polymaker, DSC); Vicat 60 °C[3] | Not documented |
| Annealing response | Bambu Lab advises against annealing thin, low-infill Aero prints[1] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors[17] | Not documented |
| Outdoor durability | Not documented | Deliberately rustable — Proto-pasta markets the iron content as oxidising when exposed to moisture[5] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Not documented | Ferromagnetic: Proto-pasta states it responds to magnets and behaves similarly to pure iron[5] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[18] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission; none of these materials was in the chamber study[18] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | None needed in a normal room[18] | Open a window / occasional ventilation[18] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Not documented | Polishing and deliberate rusting are the intended finishes[5] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Foamed surfaces are rough and matte; dimensional accuracy depends on holding the foaming temperature steady[1][2] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform dissolves the PLA matrix; the foamed wall wicks solvent right through instead of only skinning over.[19] | Chloroform dissolves the PLA matrix and leaves the iron powder behind; laboratory reagent, not workshop stock.[19][5] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise the matrix but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; acetone submersion crazes parts.[19][20] | Acetone and ethyl acetate plasticise the matrix rather than dissolving it; water attacks the exposed iron.[19][5] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Chloroform vapour reaches only the resin skin; no workshop-safe smoothing agent exists for PLA of any kind.[21][20] | None — PLA has no workshop-safe solvent, and the iron loading blocks the surface flow smoothing needs.[19] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V4.0 — PLA Aero Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- LW-PLA technical data sheet colorFabb · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyLite LW-PLA Technical Data Sheet (V7.0) Polymaker · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyWood Technical Data Sheet Version 4.0 (Nov 2018) Polymaker (copy hosted by 3Dee) · 2018-11 · tds
- Magnetic Iron PLA — product page and technical data Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · tds
- PLA Aero — product page Bambu Lab US Store · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polymaker product catalogue Polymaker · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PLA Usage Guide Bambu Lab Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials with metal or wood particles Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Polymaker PLA Pro vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Carbon Fiber PLA vs META-PLA vs PLA+ vs PLA by Sunlu — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper