Filament comparison
PP-CF vs PP-GF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | Carbon-fibre PP (PP-CF)POLYOLEFIN | Glass-fibre PP (PP-GF)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $107.68/kg median; $57.13–$120.00/kg across 3 dated product listings | $49.09/kg median; $46.27–$86.01/kg across 3 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Polypropylene reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[1][2] | Polypropylene reinforced with chopped glass fibre[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 0.91 (Prusament PP Carbon Fiber, ISO 1183)[1] | 1.12 (Prusament PP Glass Fiber, ISO 1183) — the glass lifts it above water[3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 57–138; the middle of the market is about 108[5][6][7] | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 49[8][9][10] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 57–138 across brands; Reli3D 57 at 700 g on Amazon, Prusament 108 direct from Prusa and 138 at Printed Solid, 3DXTech CarbonX PP+CF 120[5][11][6][7] | 46-86 across brands; BCN3D PP GF30 46 at 700 g, BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 49 at 2.2 kg, Prusament PP Glass Fiber 86 at 850 g[8][9][10] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[6][11] | Available from several mainstream brands[8][9][10] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 mm; 0.65 kg spools[11][6] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 700 g, 850 g and 2.2 kg spools[8][9][10] |
| Typical applications | Lightweight chemical-resistant parts, automotive clips and ducting that must survive above 150 °C[12] | Stiff, chemically resistant parts where PP-CF's cost or conductivity is unwanted[4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | ±0.04 (Prusament)[1] | ±0.04 (Prusament)[3] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 270 ± 10 (Prusament)[1] | 245 ± 10 (Prusament) — 25 °C below the carbon-fibre grade[3][1] |
| Bed temperature°C | 85 ± 10 (Prusament)[1] | 95 ± 10 (Prusament)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[13][14] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[13][14] |
| Part cooling fan | Off — Prusa runs 0 % except 100 % on bridges[1] | Off — Prusa runs 0 % except 100 % on bridges[3] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 3.2 at Prusa's 40 mm/s cap on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[1][15] | 4 at Prusa's 50 mm/s cap on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[3][15] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; Prusa recommends a brim[1] | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; Prusa recommends a brim[3] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required[1] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required[3] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[1] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[3] |
| Extruder requirement | Prusa states a hardened nozzle is necessary and recommends a brim[1] | Prusa states a hardened nozzle is necessary and recommends a brim[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Hardened steel required — Prusa states plainly that a hardened nozzle is necessary[1] | Hardened steel required[3] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[1] | Highly abrasive — standard GF composite[3] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; 3DXTech specifies a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers or higher, and Prusa lists composites as a higher clogging risk[2][16] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; Prusa lists higher risk of nozzle clogging for glass-filled composites[16] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[1] | Low (0.1–0.3 %) — 0.11 % at both 24 h and 7 days, higher than the carbon-fibre grade's 0.04 % but still very low[3][1] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[1] | 0.11 after 24 h and 0.11 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[3] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Not applicable in practice at 0.04 % equilibrium uptake[1] | Not applicable in practice at 0.11 % equilibrium uptake[3] |
| Storage requirement | No special storage needed[1] | No special storage needed[3] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 21 ± 0.4 filament tensile yield (Prusament, ISO 527)[1] | 46.6 ± 1.3 filament tensile yield (Prusament, ISO 527) — more than double the carbon-fibre grade's 21[3][1] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 14.5 ± 0.3 printed horizontal and 10.5 ± 0.8 printed vertical XZ (ISO 179-1, notched)[1] | 7.9 ± 0.4 printed horizontal and 9.9 ± 0.8 printed vertical XZ (ISO 179-1, notched)[3] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[1] | Moderate[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded unfilled PP stock (ASTM D785); no figure is published for a carbon-fibre PP filament[17] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded unfilled PP stock (ASTM D785); no figure is published for a glass-fibre PP filament[17] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good[18] | Not documented |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[1] | Rigid[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | 158 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — far above unfilled PP and above most engineering filaments[1] | 138.3 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa)[3] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | 115 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[1] | 112.6 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[3] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| Chemical resistance | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents[14] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents[14] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Excellent — essentially unaffected[1] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[3] |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[19] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[19] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[19] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[19] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[1] | Glass fibre is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[3] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves the matrix at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C, leaving the fibre.[20][21] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves the matrix at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C, leaving the fibre.[20][21] |
| Softened or crazed by | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[20] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[20] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[20] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[20] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- CarbonX PP+CF — product page 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Black 650g — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Carbon Fiber PP Filament 1.75 mm 700 g Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 2.200 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- BCN3D PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 700 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusa Prusament PP Glass Fiber Natural (NFC), 1.75 mm / 850 g 3DJAKE · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper