Filament comparison
PLA-PHA vs PP-CF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PLA/PHA blendPLA | Carbon-fibre PP (PP-CF)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $76.40/kg median; $76.40–$76.40/kg across 1 dated product listings | $107.68/kg median; $57.13–$120.00/kg across 3 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | PLA blended with polyhydroxyalkanoate, a bacterially fermented bio-polyester[1] | Polypropylene reinforced with chopped carbon fibre[2][3] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.2 (ISO 1183)[1] | 0.91 (Prusament PP Carbon Fiber, ISO 1183)[2] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | Not documented | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 57–138; the middle of the market is about 108[4][5][6] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | Not documented | 57–138 across brands; Reli3D 57 at 700 g on Amazon, Prusament 108 direct from Prusa and 138 at Printed Solid, 3DXTech CarbonX PP+CF 120[4][7][5][6] |
| Market availability1–5 | Niche, a handful of specialist brands[1][8] | Available from several mainstream brands[5][7] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 750 g and 2200 g spools[1] | 1.75 mm; 0.65 kg spools[7][5] |
| Typical applications | General-purpose printing where PLA's brittleness is the limiting factor[1] | Lightweight chemical-resistant parts, automotive clips and ducting that must survive above 150 °C[9] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | Not documented | ±0.04 (Prusament)[2] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 195–220 (colorFabb)[1] | 270 ± 10 (Prusament)[2] |
| Bed temperature°C | 50–60 (colorFabb)[1] | 85 ± 10 (Prusament)[2] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine[1] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[10][11] |
| Part cooling fan | 0–100 %; colorFabb states the blend runs on both heated and unheated beds[1][12] | Off — Prusa runs 0 % except 100 % on bridges[2] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 3.2–8 at colorFabb's 40–100 mm/s, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[12][13] | 3.2 at Prusa's 40 mm/s cap on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[2][13] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; Prusa recommends a brim[2] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Not documented | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required[2] |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Beginner — prints on any machine out of the box[1] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[2] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Prusa states a hardened nozzle is necessary and recommends a brim[2] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely[1] | Hardened steel required — Prusa states plainly that a hardened nozzle is necessary[2] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[1] | Highly abrasive — standard CF composite[2] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Very low — unfilled PLA blend; Prusa lists no drybox and no hardened nozzle for PLA[14] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; 3DXTech specifies a hardened 0.4 mm minimum nozzle and 0.25 mm layers or higher, and Prusa lists composites as a higher clogging risk[3][15] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate — the PLA matrix takes up 0.40–0.51 % saturated; colorFabb publishes no figure for the blend[16][17] | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[2] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | Not documented | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[2] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker rates PLA low-sensitivity and publishes no dry-versus-conditioned figures for this grade; absorbed water flashes to steam and shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[18] | Not applicable in practice at 0.04 % equilibrium uptake[2] |
| Storage requirement | Not documented | No special storage needed[2] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 62–64 (ISO 527-1A, colorFabb; two grades quoted)[1] | 21 ± 0.4 filament tensile yield (Prusament, ISO 527)[2] |
| Young's modulusMPa | 2960–3070 (ISO 527-1A, colorFabb)[1] | Not documented |
| Elongation at break% | 4 and 11 (ISO 527-1A, colorFabb; two grades quoted)[1] | Not documented |
| Flexural modulusMPa | 2500–3300 flexural modulus (ISO 178, colorFabb)[1] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 2.8–3.7 (ISO 179, notched, colorFabb)[1] | 14.5 ± 0.3 printed horizontal and 10.5 ± 0.8 printed vertical XZ (ISO 179-1, notched)[2] |
| Brittleness1–5 | Moderate — colorFabb positions the blend as tougher and less brittle than its generic PLA grades[1] | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[2] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | Not documented | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded unfilled PP stock (ASTM D785); no figure is published for a carbon-fibre PP filament[19] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Poor — no PLA/PHA creep test; plain printed PLA sagged from 12 to 16.2–21.8 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg[20][21][22] | Not documented |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Below average — no S-N curve for the blend; colorFabb positions it as tougher and less brittle than its generic PLA, which ran 38 000–49 000 cycles at 30 % of tensile strength[23][1] | Good[24] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Rigid[1] | Slightly flexible in thin sections[2] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 158 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa) — far above unfilled PP and above most engineering filaments[2] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | Not documented | 115 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[2] |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Above 155 melting (ISO 3146-C)[1] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Degrades within weeks outdoors[25] | Not documented |
| Chemical resistance | Not documented | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents[11] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Not documented | Excellent — essentially unaffected[2] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | colorFabb states the PHA component is 100 % biodegradable[1] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission[26] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[26] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | None needed in a normal room[26] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[26] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Not documented | Carbon fibre is bound in the matrix; sanding dust should not be inhaled[2] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | Chloroform dissolves the PLA phase (10 % w/v, 2–4 h at 23 °C); THF and DMF need 65 °C. Laboratory reagents.[27] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves the matrix at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C, leaving the fibre.[28][29] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate and toluene plasticise it but dissolve <1 % even at 65 °C; submersion in acetone crazes and destroys parts.[27][30] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[28] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Chloroform vapour smooths and welds PLA at the cost of tensile strength; acetone does not smooth it at all.[31][30] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[28] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- PLA/PHA technical data sheet colorFabb · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- CarbonX PP+CF — product page 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Black 650g — product page Prusa Research · 2026-08 · vendor
- 3DXTech product catalogue 3DXTech · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Carbon Fiber PP Filament 1.75 mm 700 g Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- Printed Solid product catalogue Printed Solid · 2026-08 · vendor
- woodFill technical data sheet colorFabb · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- glowFill technical data sheet colorFabb · 2026-08 · tds
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Filament Material Guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Bambu Filament Technical Data Sheet V3.0 — PLA Basic Bambu Lab · 2026-08 · tds
- PolyLite PLA Technical Data Sheet V5.4 Polymaker · 2024-11 · tds
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- BambuLab PLA Basic vs PLA Tough vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Polymaker PLA Pro vs PLA-CF — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Carbon Fiber PLA vs META-PLA vs PLA+ vs PLA by Sunlu — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials — PLA and PETG — For Biomechanical Applications Polymers 16(13):1868 · 2024-06 · paper
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- PLA — material guide Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Solubility Study of Ingeo Biopolymer Grades in Common Organic Solvents (NWPD003) NatureWorks · 2019-10 · tds
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc
- Effect of vapour smoothing in trichloromethane on 3D printed PLA — surface, mechanical and chemical structure Pitale, Keche & Chopra, Engineering Research Express 6(4) 045579 · 2024-12 · paper