Filament comparison
PCTG vs PP
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PCTGPETG | Polypropylene (PP)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $34.99/kg median; $14.00–$50.67/kg across 5 dated product listings | $46.56/kg median; $31.99–$53.00/kg across 4 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) glycol — a copolyester with a higher cyclohexanedimethanol content than PETG[1][2] | Polypropylene — a semi-crystalline polyolefin with no polar groups, so it neither absorbs water nor bonds to most bed surfaces[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.23 (Extrudr, ASTM D792; 3DXTech, ISO 1183)[2][5] | 0.91 (Prusa PP composite, ISO 1183) — the lightest common filament[6] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 34[7][5][8] | 1 kg-equivalent spools span 27–53; the middle of the market is about 44[9][10][11][12] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 14–51 across brands; CHCKX 14 in a 10-roll bundle, Push Plastic 30, Proto-pasta 35 at 1 kg, 3DXTech 51[7][5][13] | 27–53 across brands; Reli3D 32 on Amazon, SUNLU 44 at 0.8 kg, Fiberlogy 49 at 750 g, IEMAI 3D 53, and the 3DJake PP listing spans 27–49[9][14][10][11][12] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[7][5][8][15] | Available from several mainstream brands[14][10][9] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.5, 0.75, 1, 3 and 5 kg spools[7][8][5] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.75 kg spools are common[10] |
| Typical applications | Transparent covers, guards and impact-loaded parts where PETG cracks[1][2] | Living hinges, chemical-resistant containers, automotive clips and packaging prototypes[3] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 250–270 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | 210–230 (Braskem-type PE/PP window); Formfutura's Centaur PP melts at 205 ± 15 °C[3] |
| Bed temperature°C | 60–100 (Spectrum)[1] | Not documented |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine — Spectrum and Extrudr both say a closed chamber is not necessary, Extrudr adds it helps on larger parts[1][2] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[16][4] |
| Part cooling fan | Up to 100 % (Spectrum); 20–50 % (Extrudr)[1][2] | Part cooling fan required (Simplify3D)[16] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets; on smooth PEI a glue stick acts as a release agent[17][18] | Packing tape, a polypropylene sheet, or a PP-specific adhesive such as Magigoo PP — ordinary PLA and ABS adhesives do not hold it[16][4] |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 1.6–16 at the 20–200 mm/s Extrudr rates the material for, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[2][19] | Not documented |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; PP's crystallinity drives shrinkage and Prusa recommends a brim on its PP grades[6][20] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[17][18] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required. PP bonds to almost nothing; a polypropylene-specific tape or adhesive is the normal answer[6][4] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker names stringing as PETG's common quirk[18] | Slight — Polymaker advises 1–2 mm retraction at 20–30 mm/s[4] |
| Shrinkage% | 0.2–0.5 (Extrudr, ASTM D955)[2] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning[1][2] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; bed adhesion is the whole problem[4][6] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely — Extrudr explicitly states no hardened nozzle is needed[2] | Brass fine indefinitely for unfilled grades — Simplify3D states no special hotend is required[16] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[2] | Non-abrasive when unfilled[16] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — 3DXTech lists no special nozzle concerns and no minimum layer height for PCTG, only a 65 °C pre-dry[21] | Low — Simplify3D lists no special hotend requirement for PP and clogging is not among its listed drawbacks[22][16] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[23] | Slightly sensitive[16] |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[23] | No special hot-end required (Simplify3D)[16] |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — the copolyester matrix reaches 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH and 3DXTech specifies a 65 °C, 4 h pre-dry[17][21] | Negligible (<0.1 % EMC) — Prusa measures 0.03 % in 24 h and 0.04 % in 7 days on its PP composite, the lowest figures it publishes for any filament[6] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | Not documented | 0.03 after 24 h and 0.04 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers, measured on its PP composite)[6] |
| Drying temperature & time | Not documented | No drying step is published for PP; uptake is below the level that affects printing[6] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[22] | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle; Polymaker still advises a 70 °C dry for 4–6 h despite the low uptake[4] |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic; no dry-versus-conditioned strength figures are published for this grade and the loss shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[22] | Not applicable in practice — with equilibrium uptake at 0.04 %, there is no moisture-driven strength loss to measure. Polymaker's sensitivity tiers put polyolefins below even PLA[6][22] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[22][18] | No special storage needed[6] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 43–44 at yield and 45–46 at break (ISO 527, injection-moulded resin data from Spectrum and Extrudr); 48 on My Tech Fun printed bars[1][2][24] | 12 at yield (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[3] |
| Young's modulusMPa | Not documented | 724 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D638; converted from 105,000 psi)[25] |
| Elongation at break% | 215–220 at break on moulded specimens (ISO 527); 4.3–4.4 at yield[1][2] | Above 600 at break (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D638)[3] |
| Flexural strengthMPa | Not documented | 31.0 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D790; converted from 4500 psi)[25] |
| Flexural modulusMPa | Not documented | 402 flexural modulus (Formfutura Centaur PP, ASTM D790) — an order of magnitude below any rigid filament[3] |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 93–94 notched Izod at 23 °C on moulded specimens (ISO 180); 3DXTech quotes 8 by ISO 180/A[1][2][5] | Not documented |
| Other impact data | Izod 4.14 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars, against 3.37 for PETG on the same rig[24] | Izod notched 112 J/m on extruded PP stock, converted from 2.1 ft-lb/in (ASTM D256)[25] |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 21.6 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm printed bars, against 32.9 for PETG[24] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[1][2] | Very ductile — bends far before failing[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 69 Shore D measured by My Tech Fun, against 72 for PETG[24] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded PP stock (ASTM D785)[25] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 19.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, slightly worse than PETG's 18.2[24] | Below average[3] |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good — 215 % elongation at break and 94 kJ/m² notched Izod on moulded specimens (Extrudr, Spectrum)[1][2] | Excellent — living hinges viable, the classic polypropylene application[3] |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[24] | Semi-flexible[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 74 on extruded PP stock (ASTM D648 at 66 psi; converted from 165 °F)[25] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 78 (3DXTech, DSC)[5] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 88 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | 205 ± 15 melting (Formfutura Centaur PP)[3] |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 68 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 65 for PETG[24] | Bounded by a melting point of 205 ± 15 °C and by the 158 °C heat deflection of the carbon-filled grade; no loaded-bar service figure is published for unfilled PP[3][6] |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard grades[26] | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for the grades surveyed[6] |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| UV resistance1–5 | Not documented | Months outdoors before embrittlement — unstabilised polypropylene chalks under UV[4] |
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure[18] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents — the usual reason to choose PP[4] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — minor absorption; Spectrum describes the polymer as hydrophobic[1] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[6] |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact as filament[18] | Polypropylene is a common food-packaging polymer, but no filament here carries a food-contact certification[4] |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[18] | Not biodegradable[4] |
| Recyclability | Not accepted in household plastic collection[18] | Mechanically recyclable as resin code 5, but printed waste is not accepted in household collection[4] |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10¹³ ohm/sq — insulating (3DXTech, ASTM D257)[5] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[27] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[27] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[27] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[27] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[23] | Sands poorly — the waxy surface loads abrasive paper[16] |
| Painting & finishing | Not documented | Paint and adhesives do not key to untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is normally needed first[4] |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[23] | Nothing common bonds untreated PP; flame or plasma treatment is needed before adhesives key[4] |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[23] | No practical vapour smoothing[16] |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[23] | Prints its own supports; no soluble support is rated for PP[16] |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Optical clarity is the selling point; Extrudr recommends a layer height at most 50 % of nozzle diameter[2] | Shrinkage and warping dominate; the low modulus means parts flex rather than hold tolerance[6] |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; Eastman's CHDM copolyester data shows 1,2-dichloroethane destroying it within a week.[28] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves it at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C — the xylene-solubles route.[29][30] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften the copolyester; methanol crazes it (Eastman, 1 y at 23 °C).[28] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[29] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[31] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[29] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Spectrum Premium PCTG Technical Data Sheet Spectrum Filaments · 2026-08 · tds
- Extrudr PCTG technical data Extrudr · 2026-08 · tds
- Centaur PP Technical Data Sheet Formfutura · 2026-08 · tds
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- MAX-G PCTG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- SUNLU product catalogue SUNLU · 2026-08 · vendor
- Fiberlogy PP Natural — product page 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Reli3D Low Warp PP Filament 1.75 mm 1 kg Black — Amazon listing Amazon.com · 2026-08 · vendor
- IEMAI 3D PP 3D Printing Filament — store page IEMAI 3D · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX 10KG Multicolor PCTG Filament bundle CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- PP filament listing 3DJake International · 2026-08 · vendor
- Atomic Filament product catalogue Atomic Filament · 2026-08 · vendor
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- MAX-G PCTG — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc