Filament comparison
PCTG vs PP-GF
Compare printing settings, strength, heat resistance, dated prices and sources.
2 selected · all documented properties
| Property | PCTGPETG | Glass-fibre PP (PP-GF)POLYOLEFIN |
|---|---|---|
| Market snapshot | ||
| Listing priceUSD/kg; dated snapshots | $34.99/kg median; $14.00–$50.67/kg across 5 dated product listings | $49.09/kg median; $46.27–$86.01/kg across 3 dated product listings |
| Identity & Market | ||
| Base polymer / chemistry | Poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate) glycol — a copolyester with a higher cyclohexanedimethanol content than PETG[1][2] | Polypropylene reinforced with chopped glass fibre[3][4] |
| Densityg/cm³ | 1.23 (Extrudr, ASTM D792; 3DXTech, ISO 1183)[2][5] | 1.12 (Prusament PP Glass Fiber, ISO 1183) — the glass lifts it above water[3] |
| Typical priceUSD/kg | 1 kg spools cluster near 34[6][5][7] | 1 kg-equivalent spools cluster near 49[8][9][10] |
| Price range across brandsUSD/kg | 14–51 across brands; CHCKX 14 in a 10-roll bundle, Push Plastic 30, Proto-pasta 35 at 1 kg, 3DXTech 51[6][5][11] | 46-86 across brands; BCN3D PP GF30 46 at 700 g, BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 49 at 2.2 kg, Prusament PP Glass Fiber 86 at 850 g[8][9][10] |
| Market availability1–5 | Available from several mainstream brands[6][5][7][12] | Available from several mainstream brands[8][9][10] |
| Spool sizes & diameters | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 0.5, 0.75, 1, 3 and 5 kg spools[6][7][5] | 1.75 and 2.85 mm; 700 g, 850 g and 2.2 kg spools[8][9][10] |
| Typical applications | Transparent covers, guards and impact-loaded parts where PETG cracks[1][2] | Stiff, chemically resistant parts where PP-CF's cost or conductivity is unwanted[4] |
| Diameter tolerance± mm | Not documented | ±0.04 (Prusament)[3] |
| Printing Parameters | ||
| Nozzle temperature°C | 250–270 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | 245 ± 10 (Prusament) — 25 °C below the carbon-fibre grade[3][13] |
| Bed temperature°C | 60–100 (Spectrum)[1] | 95 ± 10 (Prusament)[3] |
| Enclosure / chamber requirement1–5 | Open frame is fine — Spectrum and Extrudr both say a closed chamber is not necessary, Extrudr adds it helps on larger parts[1][2] | Enclosure recommended — Simplify3D lists an enclosure as a hardware requirement and Polymaker advises one below 70 °C ambient to stop warping and cracking[14][15] |
| Part cooling fan | Up to 100 % (Spectrum); 20–50 % (Extrudr)[1][2] | Off — Prusa runs 0 % except 100 % on bridges[3] |
| Bed surface & adhesion aid | Textured PEI, satin or powder-coated sheets; on smooth PEI a glue stick acts as a release agent[16][17] | Not documented |
| Maximum volumetric flow (mm³/s; see test conditions)mm³/s | 1.6–16 at the 20–200 mm/s Extrudr rates the material for, on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[2][18] | 4 at Prusa's 50 mm/s cap on a 0.4 mm nozzle at 0.2 mm layer[3][18] |
| Warping tendency1–5 | Not documented | High — enclosure needed for reliable large parts; Prusa recommends a brim[3] |
| Bed-adhesion difficulty1–5 | Needs the right surface or a thin adhesive — the problem is releasing the part, not sticking it[16][17] | Very difficult — special plates or slurry required[3] |
| Stringing / oozing tendency1–5 | Moderate — retraction tuning needed; Polymaker names stringing as PETG's common quirk[17] | Not documented |
| Shrinkage% | 0.2–0.5 (Extrudr, ASTM D955)[2] | Not documented |
| Overall printing difficulty1–5 | Easy — minor profile tuning[1][2] | Advanced — enclosure, hardware upgrades, tuning; hardened nozzle mandatory[3] |
| Extruder requirement | Not documented | Prusa states a hardened nozzle is necessary and recommends a brim[3] |
| Hardware Wear & Reliability | ||
| Nozzle hardness required1–4 | Brass fine indefinitely — Extrudr explicitly states no hardened nozzle is needed[2] | Hardened steel required[3] |
| Abrasiveness1–5 | Non-abrasive[2] | Highly abrasive — standard GF composite[3] |
| Nozzle clog risk1–5 | Low — 3DXTech lists no special nozzle concerns and no minimum layer height for PCTG, only a 65 °C pre-dry[19] | Moderate — needs dry filament and a clean nozzle; Prusa lists higher risk of nozzle clogging for glass-filled composites[20] |
| Heat-creep / jam sensitivity1–5 | Slightly sensitive[21] | Not documented |
| Hotend requirement | No special hot-end required[21] | Not documented |
| Moisture Behaviour | ||
| Moisture absorption (hygroscopicity)1–5 | Moderate (0.3–0.8 %) — the copolyester matrix reaches 0.40 % saturated at 25 °C / 55 % RH and 3DXTech specifies a 65 °C, 4 h pre-dry[16][19] | Low (0.1–0.3 %) — 0.11 % at both 24 h and 7 days, higher than the carbon-fibre grade's 0.04 % but still very low[3][13] |
| Equilibrium moisture content at ~50 % RH% | Not documented | 0.11 after 24 h and 0.11 after 7 days at 24 °C / 22 % RH (Prusa Polymers)[3] |
| Symptoms when wet | Bubbling and popping at the nozzle, stringing and a rough surface[22] | Not documented |
| Effect of moisture on strength | Polymaker groups PETG with nylon, PVA and TPU as highly hygroscopic; no dry-versus-conditioned strength figures are published for this grade and the loss shows as bubbling and poor layer adhesion[22] | Not applicable in practice at 0.11 % equilibrium uptake[3] |
| Storage requirement | Sealed with desiccant; Polymaker groups PETG with the highly hygroscopic materials[22][17] | No special storage needed[3] |
| Mechanical Properties | ||
| Tensile strength (XY)MPa | 43–44 at yield and 45–46 at break (ISO 527, injection-moulded resin data from Spectrum and Extrudr); 48 on My Tech Fun printed bars[1][2][23] | 46.6 ± 1.3 filament tensile yield (Prusament, ISO 527) — more than double the carbon-fibre grade's 21[3][13] |
| Elongation at break% | 215–220 at break on moulded specimens (ISO 527); 4.3–4.4 at yield[1][2] | Not documented |
| Charpy impact, notchedkJ/m² | 93–94 notched Izod at 23 °C on moulded specimens (ISO 180); 3DXTech quotes 8 by ISO 180/A[1][2][5] | 7.9 ± 0.4 printed horizontal and 9.9 ± 0.8 printed vertical XZ (ISO 179-1, notched)[3] |
| Other impact data | Izod 4.14 kJ/m² on My Tech Fun printed bars, against 3.37 for PETG on the same rig[23] | Not documented |
| Layer adhesion / Z tensileMPa | 21.6 on My Tech Fun 4×4 mm printed bars, against 32.9 for PETG[23] | Not documented |
| Brittleness1–5 | Tough — absorbs impact, yields before breaking[1][2] | Moderate[3] |
| Hardness (scale-specific)Shore A / Shore D / Rockwell | 69 Shore D measured by My Tech Fun, against 72 for PETG[23] | Rockwell R102 (and M95) on extruded unfilled PP stock (ASTM D785); no figure is published for a glass-fibre PP filament[24] |
| Creep resistance / sustained load1–5 | Below average — a 12 mm bar sagged to 19.4 mm over 5 days at 1.25 kg, slightly worse than PETG's 18.2[23] | Not documented |
| Fatigue / repeated-flex resistance1–5 | Good — 215 % elongation at break and 94 kJ/m² notched Izod on moulded specimens (Extrudr, Spectrum)[1][2] | Not documented |
| Elasticity / flexibility1–5 | Slightly flexible in thin sections[23] | Rigid[3] |
| Thermal Properties | ||
| HDT at 0.45 MPa°C | Not documented | 138.3 (ISO 75, 0.45 MPa)[3] |
| HDT at 1.8 MPa°C | Not documented | 112.6 (ISO 75, 1.8 MPa)[3] |
| Glass transition (Tg)°C | 78 (3DXTech, DSC)[5] | Not documented |
| Melting point / Vicat°C | Amorphous — no melting point; Vicat 88 (Spectrum, Extrudr)[1][2] | Not documented |
| Continuous service temperature°C | 68 — loaded bars begin to move at this temperature, against 65 for PETG[23] | Not documented |
| Flammability / UL 94 | Flammable; no UL 94 rating published for standard grades[25] | Not documented |
| Environment & Chemical | ||
| Chemical resistance | Withstands acids, alkalis, oils and UV exposure[17] | Excellent against acids, alkalis and most solvents[15] |
| Water / humidity resistance in service1–5 | Good — minor absorption; Spectrum describes the polymer as hydrophobic[1] | Excellent — essentially unaffected[3] |
| Food contact | Not certified for food contact as filament[17] | Not documented |
| Biodegradability / compostability | Not biodegradable[17] | Not documented |
| Recyclability | Not accepted in household plastic collection[17] | Not documented |
| Electrical & ESD properties | Surface resistance above 10¹³ ohm/sq — insulating (3DXTech, ASTM D257)[5] | Not documented |
| Health & Safety | ||
| Fume toxicity1–5 | Moderate — measurable VOCs and UFPs, ventilation advised[26] | Low hazard — minimal VOC and particle emission. Inferred: no polyolefin was among the nine filaments in the Azimi chamber study, so this is a family-level judgement rather than a measurement[26] |
| Ventilation / filtration requirement1–5 | Open a window / occasional ventilation[26] | Open a window / occasional ventilation. Inferred — no polyolefin was measured in the chamber study[26] |
| Dust & fibre handling hazard | Not documented | Glass fibre is bound in the matrix; avoid inhaling sanding dust[3] |
| Post-Processing | ||
| Sanding & machining | Sands poorly — the material is tough and gums rather than powders[21] | Not documented |
| Gluing & solvent welding | Cyanoacrylate; no common solvent welds PETG cleanly[21] | Not documented |
| Vapour / chemical smoothing | No practical vapour smoothing[21] | Not documented |
| Support material pairing | Prints its own supports; Polymaker rates PolyDissolve S1 for PETG[21] | Not documented |
| Dimensional accuracy & detail | Optical clarity is the selling point; Extrudr recommends a layer height at most 50 % of nozzle diameter[2] | Not documented |
| Solvents & Solubility | ||
| Soluble in | No common workshop solvent; Eastman's CHDM copolyester data shows 1,2-dichloroethane destroying it within a week.[27] | None at room temperature; chloroform dissolves the matrix at 60 °C and xylene at about 118 °C, leaving the fibre.[28][29] |
| Softened or crazed by | Acetone, ethyl acetate, toluene and DMF swell and soften the copolyester; methanol crazes it (Eastman, 1 y at 23 °C).[27] | Xylene, decalin, CCl4 and chlorobenzene are heavily absorbed at 20 °C; oleum, chlorosulphonic acid and bromine destroy it.[28] |
| Solvent welding & smoothing agent | Dichloromethane brushed on is the only agent that smooths PETG — a controlled carcinogen, not workshop stock.[30] | None — nothing softens PP at room temperature, so joints have to be welded thermally rather than chemically.[28] |
Material entries describe families or representative grades, not an interchangeable specification for every spool. Test methods, orientations and conditions may differ. Unknown values are marked “Not documented”. Prices and source dates remain historical snapshots; check the linked guide for product details. Differences highlight text, not a universal winner.
Sources for this comparison
- Spectrum Premium PCTG Technical Data Sheet Spectrum Filaments · 2026-08 · tds
- Extrudr PCTG technical data Extrudr · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Prusament PP Glass Fiber — material page Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · doc
- MAX-G PCTG Technical Data Sheet 3DXTech · 2026-08 · tds
- Push Plastic product catalogue Push Plastic · 2026-08 · vendor
- Proto-pasta product catalogue Proto-pasta · 2026-08 · vendor
- BASF Ultrafuse PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 2.200 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- BCN3D PP GF30 Black 2.85 mm 700 g igo3d · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusa Prusament PP Glass Fiber Natural (NFC), 1.75 mm / 850 g 3DJAKE · 2026-08 · vendor
- CHCKX 10KG Multicolor PCTG Filament bundle CHCKX (Amazon US) · 2026-08 · vendor
- Atomic Filament product catalogue Atomic Filament · 2026-08 · vendor
- Prusament PP Carbon Fiber Technical Datasheet v1.0 Prusa Polymers · 2024-11 · tds
- Polypropylene — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- PP — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Prusament PETG Technical Datasheet v1.1 Prusa Polymers · 2022-02 · tds
- PETG — material basics Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- Max volumetric speed Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- MAX-G PCTG — product page (print recommendations) 3DXTech · 2026-08 · doc
- Composite materials filled with carbon, kevlar or glass Prusa Knowledge Base · 2026-08 · doc
- PET and PETG — Ultimate 3D Printing Materials Guide Simplify3D · 2026-08 · doc
- Wet Filament — signs, causes and drying Polymaker Wiki · 2026-08 · doc
- PCTG vs PETG comparison — results spreadsheet My Tech Fun (Igor Gaspar) · 2026-08 · test
- TECAFINE PP natural — stock shape properties Ensinger · 2026-08 · tds
- Prusament PETG V0 Technical Datasheet Prusa Polymers · 2026-08 · tds
- Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments (Azimi et al.) Environmental Science & Technology 50(3) 1260-1268 · 2016-01 · paper
- Eastman Spectar copolyester — Chemical resistance (unstressed bars, 1 year at 23 °C) Eastman Chemical Company · 2026-08 · tds
- Pro-fax and Moplen polypropylene — Chemical Resistance Guide (20, 60 and 100 °C) LyondellBasell · 2026-08 · tds
- US 5,278,282 Polymer recycling by selective dissolution — xylene dissolution temperatures Nauman & Lynch, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 1994-01 · paper
- Improve your 3D prints with chemical smoothing Prusa Research · 2026-08 · doc